Issue: January 2025
Fact checked byHeather Biele

Read more

December 09, 2024
2 min read
Save

Risk for detecting CRC up to 13-times higher with fecal hemoglobin in prior negative FIT

Issue: January 2025
Fact checked byHeather Biele
You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Key takeaways:

  • Individuals with fecal hemoglobin concentrations of 5 µg/g to 40 µg/g had a 5- to 13-fold higher risk for colorectal neoplasia.
  • Concentrations were “especially predictive” of advanced neoplasia.

The risk for detecting colorectal neoplasia at a subsequent screening increased by up to 13-fold relative to fecal hemoglobin concentrations in previous negative fecal immunochemical tests, according to research.

“Prior studies have shown that individuals with an [fecal hemoglobin (f-Hb)] value just below the cutoff have an increased CRC risk compared to individuals with no f-Hb or very low concentrations,” Danica M. N. van den Berg, a PhD candidate in the department of public health at Erasmus MC, and colleagues wrote in Gastroenterology. “Given the established association between f-Hb and CRC risk, risk-stratifying CRC screening programs based on quantitative FIT values could potentially improve the harm-benefit ratio of CRC screening.”

Graphic depicting higher fecal hemoglobin concentrations associated with an increased risk for colorectal neoplasia.
Data derived from: van den Berg DMN, et al. Gastroenterology. 2024;doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2024.10.047.

They continued, “Accurate risk assessment plays a crucial role in tailoring screening strategies to individuals, as misclassification of individuals into risk groups can lead to two potential issues: over- or underscreening.”

To investigate the association between prior f-Hb concentrations and the detection of colorectal neoplasia, van den Berg and colleagues conducted a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of 13 studies, which included 4,493,223 individuals at average risk for CRC.

According to the researchers, there was “a large variability” in f-Hb positivity cutoffs in the studies, which ranged from 10 µg f-Hb/g to 80 µg f-Hb/g, the most common of which was 20 µg f-Hb/g. There also was a significant positive association in the studies between f-Hb in the previous screening and the detection of colorectal neoplasia, with a pooled effect size of 0.69 (95% CI, 0.59-0.79).

When using an f-Hb reference concentration of 0 µg/g, the researchers reported that individuals with concentrations of 5 µg/g, 10 µg/g, 15 µg/g, 20 µg/g and 40 µg/g had 3.4-, 5.2-, 6.8-, 8.2- and 13-fold higher risk for colorectal neoplasia, respectively. The largest risk increase was observed between 0 µg/g and 10 µg/g, after which it decreased with rising concentrations. These results were confirmed via sensitivity analysis, with a significant, high heterogeneity (i2 = 97.5%; P < .001).

Subgroup analyses also showed that the risk associated with rising f-Hb concentrations varied by outcome and was “especially predictive” for the detection of advanced neoplasia at the next screening.

“The risk of detecting colorectal neoplasia increases with f-Hb concentrations in prior FIT, but the rate of increase diminishes as f-Hb levels rise,” van den Berg and colleagues wrote. “These findings support the potential for risk-stratified CRC screening programs based on quantitative FIT values to improve the effectiveness of screening and optimize the harm-benefit ratio.”