Fact checked byHeather Biele

Read more

May 06, 2023
1 min read
Save

Ileocecal resection may have role as ‘primary treatment’ in recently diagnosed Crohn’s

Fact checked byHeather Biele
You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

CHICAGO — Patients who underwent ileocecal resection for Crohn’s disease had a 33% lower risk for hospitalization, repeat surgery, systemic corticosteroid exposure and perianal CD, according to a presenter at Digestive Disease Week.

“The LIR!C trial has demonstrated comparable quality of life with ileocecal resection compared to infliximab as a first-line treatment for limited, non-stricturing ileocecal CD,” Manasi Agrawal, MD, MS, assistant professor of medicine at Icahn School of Medicine and gastroenterologist at Mount Sinai Hospital, told Healio. “However, real-world data on the long-term impact of primary ileocecal resection for CD, compared to medical therapy, are limited.”

Agrawal M, et al. Abstract 13: Ileocecal resection for recently diagnosed ileocecal Crohn’s disease is associated with improved long-term outcomes compared to anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy: A population-based study. Presented at: Digestive Disease Week; May 5-9, 2023; Chicago, (hybrid).
Data derived from Agrawal M, et al. Abstract 13: Ileocecal resection for recently diagnosed ileocecal Crohn’s disease is associated with improved long-term outcomes compared to anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy: A population-based study. Presented at: Digestive Disease Week; May 5-9, 2023; Chicago, (hybrid).

Agrawal and colleagues conducted a population-based study at the Aalborg University Center for Molecular Prediction of IBD in Copenhagen and used cross-linked nationwide registers to identify 16,443 patients diagnosed with ileocecal CD between 2003 and 2018. Of those, 581 underwent ileocecal resection (ICR) and 698 received anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy within 1 year of diagnosis.

Researchers compared long-term outcomes and determined the proportion of patients started on immunomodulators or anti-TNFs or who ceased therapy 5 years after ICR. The primary outcome of interest was a composite of hospitalization, repeat CD-related surgery, systemic corticosteroid exposure and diagnosis of perianal CD.

According to results, the composite outcome occurred in 273 patients who underwent ICR (IR = 110.3/100,000 person-years) and 318 patients who received anti-TNFs (IR = 201.9/100,000 person-years). Following adjustment for demographic and clinical variables, the risk for composite outcome was 33% lower in the ICR group vs. the anti-TNF group (adjusted HR = 0.67; 95% CI, 0.54-0.83).

When analyzing individual outcomes, researchers reported that ICR was associated with a reduced risk for systemic corticosteroid exposure and CD-related surgery but not CD-related hospitalization or perianal CD diagnosis.

At the 5-year follow-up, 47.5% of patients who underwent ICR were on immunomodulators, 17.1% were on anti-TNFs and 50.3% had not started treatment.

“These data suggest that ICR may have a role as primary treatment for recently diagnosed ileal/ileocecal CD,” Agrawal said. “Additional research is needed to understand features associated with lack of post-operative CD progression. This will help determine which patients who benefit most from early ICR and improve personalized treatment of CD.”