Fact checked byHeather Biele

Read more

July 20, 2023
2 min read
Save

Finger prick test detects blood-based biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease

Fact checked byHeather Biele
You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Key takeaways:

  • Researchers collected venous and finger prick blood samples from memory clinic patients and tested for biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease.
  • Several biomarkers were detected in the finger prick samples.

A finger prick test measured blood-based biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease and has potential to increase accessibility of testing, according to research at the Alzheimer’s Association International Conference.

“Currently, use of Alzheimer’s blood tests is limited by the need to visit a clinic, administration by trained personnel, and strict time-limited and temperature-dependent delivery and storage procedures,” Hanna Huber, PhD, of the Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology at the University of Gothenburg in Sweden, said in a related release.

diabetes
According to recent research out of Sweden, a provisional finger-prick blood test may increase accessibility and provide an accurate indicator of Alzheimer’s disease. Image: Adobe Stock

Huber and colleagues initiated a pilot study to determine the capability of capillary dry blood spot (DBS) and venous DBS to measure specific biomarkers of neurodegeneration: neurofilament light (NfL), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and phosphorylated tau (p-tau181 and p-tau217).

They collected venous and finger prick blood samples, EDTA plasma and neuropsychological measures from 43 memory clinic participants at ACE Alzheimer Center Barcelona and also examined cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers in 23 of those patients.

Researchers prepared 65 L of venous and capillary blood on DBS cards (Noviplex), which were shipped overnight without temperature control or cooling, to Gothenburg, Sweden. Dried blood samples were extracted from the cards, and NfL, GFAP and p-tau181 were measured.

Huber and colleagues used Pearson correlation for analysis of the DBS samples and EDTA plasma.

According to results, capillary DBS GFAP (r = 0.6773; P < .0001) and NfL levels (r = 0.4593; P = .0022) correlated with their counterparts in EDTA plasma. Similarly, venous DBS GFAP (r = 0.7624; P < .0001), NfL (r = 0.6798; P < .0001) and p-tau181 (r = 0.577; P < .0004) significantly correlated with EDTA plasma.

Additionally, both capillary and venous DBS GFAP correlated with amyloid status (r = 0.4305/r = 0.4223; P < .05) and venous DBS NfL and p-tau181 correlated with Mini-Mental State Examination and Clinical Dementia Rating assessments, as well as amyloid (all P < .05).

“A method that allows blood collection at home and that is simple enough to be performed independently, or by caregivers, would increase accessibility of these tests,” Huber said in the release. “It would result in improved early diagnosis and better monitoring of patients considered ‘at risk’ or those who are receiving approved therapies.”

Reference: