Issue: January 2023
Fact checked byMonica Stonehill

Read more

November 23, 2022
2 min read
Save

VEGA: Guselkumab plus golimumab achieved higher clinical remission rates in UC

Issue: January 2023
Fact checked byMonica Stonehill
You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

CHARLOTTE, N.C. — Guselkumab in combination with golimumab induced greater rates of clinical remission compared with monotherapy among patients with moderate to severely active ulcerative colitis.

Perspective from Benjamin L. Cohen, MD

VEGA phase 2a proof-of-concept week 12 data showed dual blockade of interleukin (IL)-23 and tumor necrosis factor induced clinical response, clinical remission, endoscopic improvement and composite histologic-endoscopic outcomes more effectively than monotherapy alone, Brian G. Feagan, MD, senior scientific director of Alimentiv Inc. and gastroenterologist at Western University, reported at the ACG Annual Scientific Meeting.

person administering an IV
“Patients treated with combination induction therapy with guselkumab plus golimumab followed by guselkumab monotherapy achieved higher rates of clinical remission, endoscopic improvement and the composite endpoint of histologic remission and endoscopic improvement,” Brian G. Feagan, MD, said.
Source: Adobe Stock.

Following these results, Feagan and colleagues aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of combined guselkumab (Tremfya, Janssen) and golimumab (Simponi, Janssen) induction therapy among 214 patients with UC. They noted enrolled patients were naive to TNF-alpha agonists and either refractory or intolerant to conventional therapy.

Patients received either IV guselkumab 200 mg at weeks 0, 4 and 8 followed by subcutaneous guselkumab 100 mg every 8 weeks (n = 71); subcutaneous golimumab 200 mg at week 0 followed by subcutaneous golimumab 100 mg at week 2 and ever 4 weeks thereafter (n = 72); or combined IV guselkumab 200 mg IV with subcutaneous golimumab 200 mg therapy at week 0, subcutaneous golimumab 100 mg at week 2,week 6 and week 10 with IV guselkumab 200 mg at week 4 and week 8 followed by subcutaneous guselkumab 100 mg ever 8 weeks thereafter (n=71). After week 12 follow-up, patients in the monotherapy group continued the same treatment regimen while patients in the combination group transition to maintenance treatment with guselkumab through 38 weeks.

Researchers assessed clinical, endoscopic, histologic and composite histologic-endoscopic outcomes as well as safety through the patient’s final visit. They noted 13.1% of patients discontinued prior to week 34.

According to study results, patients in the combination group had greater rates of clinical remission (42.7%) compared with either the guselkumab (31%) or golimumab (22.2%) monotherapy groups. Similarly, the combination group also saw greater rates of clinical remission by modified Mayo score components (47.9% vs. 31% vs. 20.8%, respectively), endoscopic improvement (49.3% vs. 32.4% vs. 22.2%), endoscopic normalization (25.4% vs. 15.5% vs. 6.9%), histologic remission (50.7% vs. 40.8% vs. 25%) and composite histologic-endoscopic endpoints (improvement: 42.3% vs. 21.1% vs. 13.9%; normalization: 23.9% vs. 12.7% vs. 5.6%).

Monotherapy group analysis further revealed greater rates of clinical, endoscopic and histologic outcomes among patients dosed with guselkumab vs. golimumab.

“Patients treated with combination induction therapy with guselkumab plus golimumab followed by guselkumab monotherapy achieved higher rates of clinical remission, endoscopic improvement and the composite endpoint of histologic remission and endoscopic improvement,” Feagan concluded. “Adverse event rates were similar across the treatment groups. Further investigation and phase 2 trials are underway.”