Read more

November 09, 2021
1 min read
Save

Squatting improves rectal evacuation among younger women with defecatory dysfunction

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Squatting assist stools improved rectal evacuation in defecatory dysfunction among women who were younger with normal stool consistency and lower resting anal sphincter pressure, according to research presented at ACG.

Perspective from Christine Lee, MD

“The squatting assist stool (SAS) has become popularized in the last decade. In theory it works by straightening the anorectal angle to improve mechanics of evacuation,” Lauren Ulsh, MD, a second-year resident at Stanford University Medical Center, said. “We hypothesized that squatting can help some individuals with defecatory dysfunction overcome anorectal dyssynergia.”

Factors associated with improved rectal evacuation among women using a squatting assist stool:

To identify characteristics and anorectal pressure profiles of patients with defecatory dysfunction who may benefit from SAS, researchers conducted a retrospective review of 657 participants (524 women) evaluated for defecatory dysfunction by anorectal manometry (ARM) and balloon expulsion test (BET). They provided SAS to the 249 women (38%) who initially failed with abnormal BET after 2 minutes of testing.

Among these 249 women, 16% (n = 40) then passed with SAS and 84% (n = 209) failed with or without SAS. Patients who benefitted from SAS were younger (P = .003), had a higher BMI (P = .022), normal stool consistency (P = .007), less laxative use (P = .023) and abdominal pain (P = .046) and had higher Cleveland Clinic Fecal Incontinence scores (P = .039). When researchers compared ARM data, women who benefitted from SAS vs. failed had lower anal resting tone and residual pressures during defecation without differences in rectal pressure, the percentage of anal sphincter relaxation and rectal sensation. Younger age (< 50 years; OR = 0.93; 95% CI, 0.891-0.971; P = .001), normal stool consistency (OR = 3.862; 95% CI, 1.209-12.34; P = .023), lower resting anal sphincter pressure (OR = 0.97; 95% CI, 0.95-0.99; P = .004) and positive anorectal pressure gradient (OR = 1.02; 95% CI, 1.001-1.038; P = .038) were independent factors associated with successful BET with SAS in women.

“Squatting may facilitate rectal evacuation in a subgroup of patients with functional defecatory disorders. Women who benefited from squatting had certain clinical characteristics and significantly different symptom severity scores: younger women with normal strong consistency, lower anal tone and a greater anorectal pressure gradient are likely to benefit from the squatty assist stool,” Ulsh concluded. “It's unclear whether squatting facilitates defecation by a change in anorectal pressure and/or anorectal alignment.”