Treatment Algorithm

Reviewed on August 08, 2024

Introduction

The primary treatment goals of managing type 2 diabetes (T2D) are to:

  • Eliminate symptoms of hyperglycemia
  • Recognize the symptoms of hypoglycemia
  • Achieve and maintain normal or near-normal metabolic and biochemical parameters (both fasting and postprandial blood glucose levels, A1C [Table 20-1] and time in range [70 to 180 mg/dL], low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and fasting triglycerides)
  • Achieve normal blood pressure and address procoagulant state
  • Reduce insulin resistance and its adverse metabolic consequences
  • Assist the patient in achieving and maintaining a reasonable body weight
  • Prevent or delay the development and progression of microvascular and macrovascular complications

Therapeutic efforts to achieve these goals involve using a variety of treatment modalities:

  • Dietary modifications
  • Regular physical activity
  • Aspirin therapy (if indicated)
  • Antidiabetic agents
  • Insulin (via injections, inhalation, or pump)

An individualized approach is…

Introduction

The primary treatment goals of managing type 2 diabetes (T2D) are to:

  • Eliminate symptoms of hyperglycemia
  • Recognize the symptoms of hypoglycemia
  • Achieve and maintain normal or near-normal metabolic and biochemical parameters (both fasting and postprandial blood glucose levels, A1C [Table 20-1] and time in range [70 to 180 mg/dL], low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and fasting triglycerides)
  • Achieve normal blood pressure and address procoagulant state
  • Reduce insulin resistance and its adverse metabolic consequences
  • Assist the patient in achieving and maintaining a reasonable body weight
  • Prevent or delay the development and progression of microvascular and macrovascular complications

Therapeutic efforts to achieve these goals involve using a variety of treatment modalities:

  • Dietary modifications
  • Regular physical activity
  • Aspirin therapy (if indicated)
  • Antidiabetic agents
  • Insulin (via injections, inhalation, or pump)

An individualized approach is recommended based on the following:

  • Patient age
  • The presence of coexisting illnesses and/or diabetes-related complications
  • Lifestyle, including:
  • -Attitude
  • -Habits
  • -Cultural/ethnic status
  • Financial considerations
  • Ability to learn and follow self-management skills
  • Level of patient motivation.

The cornerstone of effective diabetes management is maintaining good glycemic control. Compelling evidence indicates that long-term glycemic control can prevent or delay the microvascular complications of diabetes. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) and the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) demonstrated definitively the value of improved glycemic therapy in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and type 2 diabetes in delaying the onset and slowing the progression of retinopathy, nephropathy, and neuropathy. The benefits of reducing glycemia are seen in both type 1 and type 2 diabetes.

The American Diabetes Association (ADA) now recommends establishing a management goal of achieving the best possible blood glucose control in patients with type 2 diabetes. Treatment methods for managing type 2 diabetes should focus on:

  • Dietary modifications
  • Exercise
  • Weight control
  • Supplemental oral hypoglycemic agents and/or insulin as needed.

The 2024 ADA Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes include an algorithm (Figure 20-1) that provides a general guideline for making decisions regarding the various types of pharmacologic therapy. In the wake of the unexpected success of cardiovascular (CV) outcome trials of several sodium glucose cotransporter type 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and glucogonlike peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, the approach to pharmacologic treatment of T2D has undergone a paradigm shift to prioritize agents that offer benefits beyond glycemic control. This is reflected in the algorithm, which now prominently includes recommendations for patients with or at risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), heart failure (HF), and chronic kidney disease (CKD), independent of their baseline glycosylated hemoglobin (A1C), A1C target, or metformin use. Another significant change is a shift away from metformin as the default first-line pharmacological therapy (in conjunction with lifestyle changes) to include other options depending on patient-centered factors, including comorbidities and patient-specific glycemic management needs. Additionally, the algorithm now recognizes that sequential addition of therapy need not be the only approach to treatment intensification; switching therapies or weaning current therapy are presented as alternatives means of therapeutic tailoring. Finally, the algorithm emphasizes three important factors in agent selection: 1) minimization of the risk of hypoglycemia; 2) minimization of weight gain/promotion of weight loss; and 3) affordability and access concerns (use of generics where available).

Enlarge  Figure 20-1: Pharmacologic Approaches to Gylcemic Treatment: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes, 2024<sup>a</sup>. Key: ACEi, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; ACR, albumin-to-creatinine ratio; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker; ASCVD, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; CGM, continuous glucose monitoring; CKD, chronic kidney disease; CV, cardiovascular; CVD, cardiovascular disease; CVOT, cardiovascular outcomes trial; DPP-4i, dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; GLP-1 RA, glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist; HF, heart failure; HFpEF, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; HFrEF, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction; HHF, hospitalization for heart failure; MACE, major adverse cardiovascular events; MI, myocardial infarction; SDOH, social determinants of health; SGLT2i, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor; T2D, type 2 diabetes; TZD, thiazolidinedione. The 2024 ADA PPC adaptation emphasizes incorporation of therapy rather than sequential add-on, which may require adjustment of current therapies. Therapeutic regimen should be tailored to comorbidities, patient-centered treatment factors, and management needs. *	In people with HF, CKD, established CVD, or multiple risk factors for CVD, the decision to use a GLP-1 RA or SGLT2i with proven benefit should be independent of background use of metformin. ✝ A strong recommendation is warranted for people with CVD and a weaker recommendation for those with indicators of high CV risk. Moreover, a higher absolute risk reduction and thus lower numbers needed to treat are seen at higher levels of baseline risk and should be factored into the shared decision-making process. ^ Low-dose TZD may be better tolerated and similarly effective. § For SGLT2i, CV/renal outcomes trials demonstrate their efficacy in reducing the risk of composite MACE, CV death, all-cause mortality, MI, HHF, and renal outcomes in individuals with T2D with established/high risk of CVD. #	For GLP-1RA, CVOTs demonstrate their efficacy in reducing composite MACE, CV death, all-cause mortality, MI, stroke, and renal endpoints in individuals with T2D with established/high risk of CVD. Source: Adapted from Diabetes Care.<em> </em>2024;47(Suppl 1):S158-S178..
Figure 20-1: Pharmacologic Approaches to Gylcemic Treatment: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes, 2024a. Key: ACEi, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; ACR, albumin-to-creatinine ratio; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker; ASCVD, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; CGM, continuous glucose monitoring; CKD, chronic kidney disease; CV, cardiovascular; CVD, cardiovascular disease; CVOT, cardiovascular outcomes trial; DPP-4i, dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; GLP-1 RA, glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist; HF, heart failure; HFpEF, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; HFrEF, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction; HHF, hospitalization for heart failure; MACE, major adverse cardiovascular events; MI, myocardial infarction; SDOH, social determinants of health; SGLT2i, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor; T2D, type 2 diabetes; TZD, thiazolidinedione. The 2024 ADA PPC adaptation emphasizes incorporation of therapy rather than sequential add-on, which may require adjustment of current therapies. Therapeutic regimen should be tailored to comorbidities, patient-centered treatment factors, and management needs. * In people with HF, CKD, established CVD, or multiple risk factors for CVD, the decision to use a GLP-1 RA or SGLT2i with proven benefit should be independent of background use of metformin. ✝ A strong recommendation is warranted for people with CVD and a weaker recommendation for those with indicators of high CV risk. Moreover, a higher absolute risk reduction and thus lower numbers needed to treat are seen at higher levels of baseline risk and should be factored into the shared decision-making process. ^ Low-dose TZD may be better tolerated and similarly effective. § For SGLT2i, CV/renal outcomes trials demonstrate their efficacy in reducing the risk of composite MACE, CV death, all-cause mortality, MI, HHF, and renal outcomes in individuals with T2D with established/high risk of CVD. # For GLP-1RA, CVOTs demonstrate their efficacy in reducing composite MACE, CV death, all-cause mortality, MI, stroke, and renal endpoints in individuals with T2D with established/high risk of CVD. Source: Adapted from Diabetes Care. 2024;47(Suppl 1):S158-S178..

References

  • Edelman SV. Diagnosis and Management of Type 2 Diabetes. 14th ed. Professional Communications Inc. 2022
  • American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes–2024. Diabetes Care. 2024;47(Suppl 1):S1–S321.
  • Davidson JA, Blonde L, Jellinger PS, Lebovitz HE, Parkin CG. Road map for the prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes. Endocr Pract. 2006;12(suppl 1):148-151.
  • Mudaliar S, Henry RR. Combination therapy for type 2 diabetes. Endocrinol Pract. 1999;5:208-219.
  • Nathan DM, Buse JB, Davidson MB, et al. Management of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes: a consensus algorithm for the initiation and adjustment of therapy. A consensus statement from the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Diabetologia. 2006;49:1711-1721.
  • Ohkubo Y, Kishikawa H, Araki E, et al. Intensive insulin therapy prevents the progression of diabetic microvascular complications in Japanese patients with non–insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: a randomized prospective 6-year study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 1995; 28:103-117.
  • Texas Department of State Health Services. Insulin algorithm for type 2 diabetes mellitus in children and adults. Texas Diabetes Council Web site. http://www.tdctoolkit.org/algorithms_and_guidelines.asp. Revised October 28, 2010. Accessed June 12, 2013.
  • United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet. 1998;352:837-853.