Read more

March 30, 2021
1 min read
Save

Initial WHO report finds no conclusive evidence of SARS-CoV-2 origin

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

A team of investigators who traveled to China did not find conclusive evidence of the origin of SARS-CoV-2, although they said humans were “likely to very likely” exposed through an intermediary animal host.

Perspective from Krutika Kuppalli, MD, FIDSA

In a 120-page report released Tuesday by WHO, the investigators also said that a direct zoonotic spillover to humans was “possible to likely,” and that it was also “possible” that humans were exposed through the cold food chain.

They said it was “extremely unlikely” that the coronavirus was introduced to the general public through a laboratory incident — a scenario that received renewed attention recently after former CDC Director Robert R. Redfield, MD, told CNN that he believed the virus originated in a lab.

The findings were based on a trip by an international team of experts to Wuhan earlier this year. Based on phylogenetic analyses, the investigators said bats appear to be the reservoir for SARS-CoV-2, but no intermediate host has been identified.

The investigators confirmed widespread SARS-CoV-2 contamination of surfaces in an animal market in Wuhan that has long been speculated as the origin of the virus’ introduction to humans. The contamination was “compatible with virus shedding from infected people in the market at the end of December 2019,” they said. However, extensive testing of animal products in the market did not turn up evidence of the virus.

“Many of the early cases were associated with the Huanan market, but a similar number of cases were associated with other markets and some were not associated with any markets,” the investigators wrote, noting that they could draw “no firm conclusion” about the Huanan market’s role in the origin of the outbreak.

The investigators said they found “little evidence” of SARS-CoV-2 transmission before December 2019 but could not rule out the possibility that some transmission was occurring at low levels.

“As far as WHO is concerned, all hypotheses remain on the table,” WHO Director General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, PhD, MSc, said in a statement. “This report is a very important beginning, but it is not the end.”

Tedros recommended that further research include a full analysis of the animal trade in Wuhan, and agreed with investigators that farmers, suppliers and their contacts also be interviewed.

Peter K. Ben Embarek

Peter K. Ben Embarek, PhD, who led the WHO team, said identifying an intermediate host has been difficult.

“We're conducting a large number of surveys on animals, different types of animals, wild animals, animals from zoos, animals from farms, domestic animals, etc. Dozens of thousands of animals were tested and all [were] negative,” Ben Embarek said during a press conference.

According to the report, human-to-human transmission of SARS-CoV-2 began before the initiation of any control measures, which subsequently led to a high rate of spread around Wuhan to other parts of Hubei province and China. There was a lot of movement from Wuhan during the 2020 Chinese New Year, leading to spread beyond the city, investigators said.

References:

Former CDC director believes virus came from lab in China. [VIDEO]. CNN. https://www.cnn.com/videos/health/2021/03/26/sanjay-gupta-exclusive-robert-redfield-coronavirus-opinion-origin-sot-intv-newday-vpx.cnn. Published March 26, 2021. Accessed March 30, 2021.

WHO. WHO-convened global study of origins of SARS-CoV-2: China part. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/who-convened-global-study-of-origins-of-sars-cov-2-china-part. Accessed March 30, 2021.