Read more

November 22, 2021
2 min read
Save

Patient-reported outcomes beyond 1 year may be unnecessary for accurate TKA assessment

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Primary total knee arthroplasty patient-reported outcomes through the 1-year follow-up reliably predicted longer-term outcomes, according to results presented the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons Annual Meeting.

Abhijit Seetharam, MD, and colleagues conducted a retrospective review of prospectively collected patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for 1,093 primary TKA procedures performed by a single surgeon from 2010 to 2018 to determine the value of long-term PROMs in primary TKA. The study received the AAHKS Clinical Research Award.

The study “examined whether the 2-year minimum follow-up after TKA required by most academic journals was necessary for an accurate assessment of patient outcomes after primary TKA,” according to an AAHKS press release.

Need for 2-year PROMs

Abhijit Seetharam
Abhijit Seetharam

“We are required to collect all of these PROMs to a minimum of 2 years for most of the journals that we want to publish our research in. Is that really necessary or can we get away with collecting PROMs for a year out for the sake of clinical research?” Seetharam told Healio Orthopedics.

Extended collection of PROMs can pose a burden to physicians, researchers, clinic staff and patients. Therefore, “being able to limit that, I think, is helpful for everyone involved in the process,” he said.

PROMS that the researchers looked at were pain with Knee Society Scores (KSS) for level walking and stair climbing, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) activity level and KOOS JR scores at 4 months, 1 year and a minimum of 2 years postoperatively.

Scores improved postoperatively

Results showed KSS, UCLA and KOOS JR scores at all three postoperative timepoints improved from preoperative levels.

“Those are all fairly commonly used outcome measures and they’re the ones we routinely collect, so we were sufficiently powered to study the PROMs that we did at at least an 80% power level,” Seetharam told Healio Orthopedics.

“Along with that, we looked at the minimal clinically important difference or the MCID. We were also sufficiently powered to study that and to draw conclusions for that,” he said.

Regarding reaching the MCID of 6.0 that researchers established, results showed that despite the statistical and clinical significance of the improvement in the PROMs from preoperative to 4 months and 1 year postoperatively, “improvements from 1-year to minimum 2-year follow-up were small and did not reach MCIDs for most PROMs demonstrating significant overlap of 95% confidence intervals,” the researchers wrote in the abstract.

“You do see a plateau between that 1-year and 2-year mark,” Seetharam said. “It certainly was nice to see after just having some anecdotal or kind of experience-driven thought. It’s nice to see the numbers backing that up.”

In addition, patient satisfaction during postoperative follow-up of the study group at 4 months, 1 year and 2 years improved 84%, 87.3% and 90.9%, respectively, according to the abstract.

“Researchers concluded that 1-year PROMs were as clinically reliable and meaningful as 2-year PROMs. While long-term follow-up after TKA remains important for implant survivorship and function, these findings question the necessity of in-person visits to collect PROMs beyond 1 year and suggest that 1-year outcomes are reliably predictive of longer-terms outcomes for peer-reviewed publication,” according to the press release.