Pamrevlumab nonsuperior to placebo for boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy
Key takeaways:
- Change in North Star Ambulatory Assessment at 52 weeks was not significant for treatment group or placebo.
- Nearly all study participants experienced a treatment-emergent adverse event.
For young ambulatory boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy, treatment with pamrevlumab was nonsuperior to placebo after 52 weeks, according to a poster presentation at the 2024 MDA Clinical & Scientific Conference.
“In [Duchenne muscular dystrophy], fibrosis due to absent or dysfunctional dystrophin protein has been linked to overexpression of connective tissue growth factor (CTGF),” Brenda L. Wong, MD, a neurologist at the University of Massachusetts Medical School and Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Center, and colleagues wrote. “Pamrevlumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that binds to and inhibits the activity of CTGF.”
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a75c5/a75c52cd82fb0be1f08897b13bd75e9c6f506b25" alt="Young boy muscular dystrophy_293147753"
As there are no currently effective treatments for the condition outside of commonly prescribed corticosteroids, Wong and colleagues commenced a global phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter study to determine safety and efficacy of pamrevlumab for boys aged 6 to younger than 12 years with DMD who were able to walk.
A total of 73 participants were randomized 1:1 to receive either IV infusion of pamrevlumab 35 mg/kg every 2 weeks for 52 weeks or placebo, while also receiving systemic glucocorticoids (deflazacort or prednisone/prednisolone) during the study period.
The primary endpoint was change in North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA) total score from baseline to week 52, with secondary endpoints including changes in four-stair climb velocity, 10-meter walk/run test, time to stand, and time to loss of ambulation at 52 weeks, along with tracking of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs).
According to results, the difference in change of NSAA score was not significant (least squares mean: pamrevlumab, –3.022 [0.5505] vs. placebo, –2.494 [0.6962]).
Additionally, for all secondary endpoints, no significant differences were observed between those in the pamrevlumab group as well as those given placebo, while data further showed nearly all participants (pamrevlumab, n = 35; placebo, n = 35) experienced treatment-emergent adverse events, most of which were mild to moderate. No deaths occurred in either treatment group.
“Pamrevlumab was generally well-tolerated and no new safety concerns were identified for patients with [Duchenne muscular dystrophy],” Wong and colleagues wrote.