Read more

December 09, 2020
2 min read
Save

Cigarette smoking increases risk for CRC

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

The risk for colorectal cancer increased with cigarette smoking, according to a study published in the American Journal of Gastroenterology.

Perspective from Carole Macaron, MD

“The association is driven by the selective effect of smoking on the risk of CRC developing through the [microsatellite] pathway,” Edoardo Botteri, PhD, from the section for colorectal cancer screening at the Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, and colleagues wrote. “Our findings support smoking cessation to reduce the risk of CRC. Further evaluations of the molecular mechanisms through which smoking affects colorectal carcinogenesis are warranted.”

Botteri and colleagues performed a systematic review and metanalysis of 188 studies on the correlation between cigarette smoking and CRC. Investigators calculated the relative risk of CRC regarding smoking status, intensity, duration, packing-years and time since quitting.

Results showed the pooled RR for CRC was 1.14 (95% CI, 1.1–1.18) for current smokers and 1.17 (95% CI, 1.15–1.2) for former smokers compared with nonsmokers. Investigators noted the risk for CRC increased linearly with smoking intensity and duration.

“Former smokers who had quit smoking for more than 25 years had significantly decreased risk of CRC compared with current smokers,” the investigators wrote.

According to researchers, smoking was significantly correlated with the risk for CRC. This was characterized by high CpG island methylator phenotype (RR = 1.42; 95% CI, 1.2–1.67; number of studies [n] = 4), BRAF mutation (RR = 1.63; 95% CI, 1.23–2.16; n = 4), or high microsatellite instability (RR = 1.56; 95% CI, 1.32–1.85; n = 8). However, it was not characterized by KRAS (RR = 1.04; 95% CI, 0.9–1.2; n=55) or TP53 (RR = 1.13; 95% CI, 0.99–1.29; n=55) mutations.

“Regarding time since smoking cessation, we acknowledge that few studies attempted to adjust the analysis for smoking history measures, such as smoking duration and intensity,” Botteri and colleagues. “Thus, we cannot quantify how much the estimates for smoking cessation are influenced by those factors, and our findings should be considered with caution.”