July 08, 2019
4 min read
Save

Both heart score, physician assessment fail to ‘safely’ rule out acute coronary syndrome

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Used independently, the Marburg Heart Score and a family practitioner’s assessment could not “safely” rule out acute coronary syndrome among patients with chest pain in The Netherlands, according to findings from a flash-mob study recently published in Annals of Family Medicine. In combination, they showed utility, but may not be practical for clinical use.

Perspective from John Cole, MD, MS

Angel M.R. Schols , MD, PhD, of the department of family medicine at Maastricht University in The Netherlands and colleagues asked family practitioners to assess the probability of acute coronary syndrome on a scale of one to 10 among 243 patients referred to secondary care for the condition. They evaluated the Marburg Test Score — which includes factors such as sex, age, known heart disease, patient’s thoughts on where pain is located, and pain not made worse with exercise or replicated by palpation — and family practitioner assessment — whether the attending family practitioner immediately suspected a serious diagnosis and his or her assessment of the likelihood of acute coronary syndrome, whether the patient indicated that the pain felt like pressure, how long the symptoms lasted and signs of ischemia on ECG if one was performed.

Schols and colleagues found that only 45 patients received a diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome. The sensitivity of the Marburg Heart Score (maximum score = 2) was 75%, specificity was 44%, positive predictive value was 24.3% and negative predictive value was 88%. For the family practitioner’s assessment (maximum score = 5), sensitivity was 86.7%, specificity was 41.4%, positive predictive value was 25.2% and negative predictive value was 93.2%.

“The Marburg Health Score and family practitioner assessments individually showed insufficient diagnostic accuracy to safely rule out acute coronary syndrome in referred patients. When combined, however, they safely reduced the number of referrals by 19% by applying the Marburg Heart Score only for referred patients considered to be at low risk of having an acute coronary syndrome by the family practitioner’s assessment. Yet, such a strategy meets practical limitations,” Schols and colleagues wrote.

“Family practitioners would have to apply this strategy after they made the decision to refer, meaning family practitioners should incidentally correct their decision to refer. Therefore, the suggested strategy should be validated in a sufficient large cohort including both referred and nonreferred patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome,” they added.

Researchers also discussed the rationale for utilizing a flash-mob approach for their study.

Middle aged white man having chest pain 
Used independently, the Marburg Heart Score and a family practitioner’s assessment could not “safely” rule out acute coronary syndrome among patients with chest pain in The Netherlands, according to findings from a flash-mob study recently published in Annals of Family Medicine. In combination, they showed utility, but may not be practical for clinical use.
Source:Shutterstock

“Typical prospective research studies can large amounts of time and money,” Schols and colleagues wrote.

“Recently, an innovative research method, the flash-mob method, has been used in hospital-based studies, allowing for the investigation of one simple research question on a large scale and over a short time frame. Flash-mob research is based on the concept of flash mobs, ‘a large public gathering at which people perform an unusual or seemingly random act and then disperse, typically organized by means of the Internet or social media,’” they added.

Schols and colleagues cautioned that though they believe flash-mob research in family medicine is “feasible and that it may be considered for use as a new research method,” the technique is not applicable to all situations. by Janel Miller

Disclosures : The authors report no relevant financial disclosures.