Read more

September 16, 2024
1 min read
Save

Bone marrow aspirate concentrate may not benefit patients undergoing meniscectomy

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Key takeaways:

  • Bone marrow aspirate concentrate injections may not provide benefit as an adjuvant for arthroscopic partial meniscectomy.
  • Bone marrow aspirate concentrate was associated with similar outcomes vs. controls.

Published results showed autologous bone marrow aspirate concentrate injections may not provide benefit as an adjuvant for patients with meniscal tears and concomitant knee osteoarthritis who undergo arthroscopic partial meniscectomy.

Adam B. Yanke, MD, PhD, director of clinical research for the department of orthopedics and co-director of the cartilage restoration center at Rush University Medical Center, and colleagues performed a prospective, randomized controlled trial of 83 patients who underwent arthroscopic partial meniscectomy for symptomatic meniscal tears and mild knee OA.

Biologic product
Bone marrow aspirate concentrate injections may not provide benefit as an adjuvant for arthroscopic partial meniscectomy. Image: Adobe Stock

Yanke and colleagues randomly assigned 44 patients (mean age, 55.2 years) to receive a 60 mL injection of autologous bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) into the operative knee during surgery and 39 patients (mean age, 54.9 years) to undergo surgery without BMAC.

Patient-reported outcomes were collected at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years after surgery and included IKDC, KOOS, VAS and Veterans RAND 12-item (VR-12) scores. Yanke and colleagues also assessed Kellgren-Lawrence grades on radiographs.

Overall, Yanke and colleagues found no statistically significant differences between mean IKDC score at 1 year for patients who received BMAC (68.1) vs. patients who did not receive BMAC (70.4). They found no statistically significant differences in Kellgren-Lawrence grades, KOOS, VAS or VR-12 scores between the groups at any postoperative time point. They noted both groups had significant improvements in all patient-reported outcomes. However, Kellgren-Lawrence grades indicated significant radiographic progression of OA.

Yanke and colleagues noted patients who received BMAC were more likely to achieve the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for KOOS sport and symptoms subscales at 1 year. However, they found no other statistically significant differences in MCID achievement for any other outcomes between the groups.

Yanke and colleagues concluded arthroscopic partial meniscectomy may benefit patients with meniscal tears and knee OA with or without BMAC.