Read more

December 20, 2023
1 min read
Save

Frailty risk score may predict increased complications, costs after revision TKA

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Key takeaways:

  • Frailty was associated with loosening, infection, instability, longer length of stay, readmission and increased costs after revision TKA.
  • Patients categorized as frail may need preoperative risk stratification.
Perspective from Andrew I. Spitzer, MD

Results showed patients categorized as frail may be at risk for loosening, infection, instability, longer length of stay, readmission and increased costs after revision total knee arthroplasty vs. with patients without frailty.

To evaluate the impact of frailty on surgical outcomes, researchers used the Nationwide Readmissions database to analyze patients who underwent revision TKA between January 2017 and November 2019. According to the study, outcomes were assessed at 30 days and included complications, readmissions, length of stay (LOS) and total hospital costs.

hospital bed
Frailty was associated with loosening, infection, instability, longer length of stay, readmission and increased costs after revision TKA. Image: Adobe Stock

Patients were classified as frail if they had a hospital frailty risk score of five or greater. Among 25,177 patients who underwent surgery for mechanical loosening, 9.8% (n = 2,464) were classified as frail. Among 12,712 patients who underwent surgery for infection, 29.2% (n = 3,706) were classified as frail. Among 9,458 patients who underwent surgery for instability, 12.2% (n = 1,153) were classified as frail.

Overall, researchers found patients categorized as frail had higher rates of 30-day readmission compared with patients without frailty (7.8% vs. 3.7% for loosening; 13.5% vs. 8.1% for infection; and 8.7% vs. 3.9% for instability). Patients categorized as frail had longer LOS compared with patients without frailty (4.1 days vs. 2.4 days for loosening; 8.1 days vs. 4.4 days for infection; and 4.9 days vs. 2.4 days for instability. Patients categorized as frail also had greater hospital costs compared with patients without frailty ($32,082 vs. $27,582 for loosening; $32,898 vs. $28,115 for infection; and $29,790 vs. $24,164 for instability).

In addition, researchers noted patients categorized as frail had higher 30-day complication and reoperation rates vs. patients without frailty.

“Assessing patient frailty is a relatively novel and promising method for preoperative risk stratification,” the researchers wrote in the study.