February 20, 2013
1 min read
Save

Large-balloon dilation alone safely, effectively treated large bile duct stones

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Patients with large bile duct stones treated with endoscopic large-balloon dilation alone had similar outcomes to those treated with endoscopic sphincterotomy and dilation in a recent study.

Researchers evaluated the outcomes and incidence of complications in 131 patients with common bile duct (CBD) stones of 12 mm or larger who underwent either large-balloon dilation (LBD; n=62), or LBD with endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST; n=69).

Stones were successfully removed in nearly all cases for both groups (96.8%, LBD group; 95.7%, EST/LBD group; P=.738), including patients who ultimately underwent mechanical lithotripsy (ML). The majority of patients did not require ML (80.6%, LBD; 73.9%, EST/LBD recipients; P=.36). Complete duct clearance despite ML did not occur in five cases, including two LBD patients and three EST/LBD patients because of stone impaction or incomplete capture.

Patients who experienced complete stone removal without ML had significantly smaller stones than those who did not in both groups (14.6 ± 2.1 mm vs. 20.2 ± 3.5 mm, LBD; 15.5 ± 2.9 mm vs. 19.4 ± 5.9 mm, EST/LBD). The balloon/stone diameter ratio also was higher in these cases (1.01 ± 0.1 vs. 0.82 ± 0.08, LBD; 1.15 ± 0.19 vs. 0.90 ± 0.18, EST/LBD) (P<.001 for all comparisons).

Complications occurred at similar rates between groups, and included pancreatitis (6.5% of LBD recipients vs. 4.3% in the EST/LBD group; P=.593), perforation (0% vs. 1.4%; P=.341) and basket and stone impaction (0% vs. 1.4%; P=.341). All complications were resolved, and investigators noted that no significant hemorrhages occurred.

“To our knowledge, this is the first study to compare the efficacy and safety of LBD alone with [EST/LBD] for the treatment of large bile duct stones,” the researchers wrote. “LBD alone may be a simple, safe and effective alternative to [EST/LBD] in relatively aged patients with large CBD stones, and it can simplify the procedure compared with [EST/LBD].

“[However,] the efficacy and safety of LBD alone in relatively young patients with large CBD stones remains uncertain.”