Read more

September 16, 2024
1 min read
Save

Benefit of adjuvant pembrolizumab in endometrial cancer varies by mismatch repair status

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Key takeaways:

  • Results showed a DFS benefit with the addition of pembrolizumab to chemotherapy for patients with mismatch repair-deficient tumors.
  • The rate of grade 3 or greater adverse events was slightly higher with pembrolizumab.

The addition of pembrolizumab to adjuvant chemotherapy improved DFS for certain women with newly diagnosed high-risk endometrial cancer, according to randomized phase 3 study results presented at ESMO Congress.

The benefit appeared limited to women with mismatch repair-deficient tumors. Results showed no benefit in the overall study population.

Adjuvant pembrolizumab conferred a infographic
Data derived from Van Gorp T, et al. Abstract LBA28. Presented at: European Society for Medical Oncology Congress; Sept. 13-17; Barcelona, Spain.

Prior studies showed the addition of the anti-PD-1 antibody pembrolizumab (Keytruda, Merck) to chemotherapy conferred benefit as first-line treatment for women with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer regardless of mismatch repair (MMR) status, according to study background.

Researchers conducted the KEYNOTE-B-21 study to assess the efficacy of adding pembrolizumab to adjuvant chemotherapy for women with newly diagnosed, high-risk endometrial cancer who underwent surgery with curative intent.

The trial included 1,095 women with newly diagnosed, histologically confirmed high-risk endometrial l cancer who had no evidence of disease after curative-intent surgery.

Trial protocol excluded women who received prior radiation therapy or systemic therapy.

Researchers assigned 545 women to 200 mg pembrolizumab every 3 weeks for 6 cycles plus carboplatin-paclitaxel, followed by 400 mg pembrolizumab once every 6 weeks for six cycles. The other 550 women received placebo plus carboplatin-paclitaxel, followed by placebo.

DFS per investigator assessment and OS in the intent-to-treat population served as the primary endpoints.

At the time of interim analysis, 119 (22%) DFS events had occurred in the pembrolizumab group and 121 (22%) had occurred in the placebo group (HR = 1.02; 95% CI, 0.79-1.32).

In the overall population, 2-year DFS appeared comparable between the pembrolizumab and placebo groups (75% vs. 76%).

However, subgroup analysis revealed significantly improved DFS for women with MMR-deficient tumors (HR = 0.31; 95% CI, 0.14-0.69), compared with no benefit for women with MMR-proficient tumors (HR = 1.2; 95% CI, 0.91-1.57).

A higher percentage of women assigned pembrolizumab experienced grade 3 or higher adverse events (71% vs. 63%). No treatment-related grade 5 events occurred.