We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.
WASHINGTON — Patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease who develop interstitial lung disease demonstrate similar 1-year mortality risks following either single- or double-lung transplant, according to data.
The finding, presented at ACR Convergence 2024, suggests that, for patients with late-stage lung disease from ILD and systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs), single-lung transplants are a reasonable strategy to effectively increase the number of lungs available for transplantation, said the lead author.
“In other forms of ILD — we’ll take idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) as an example — similar 1-year mortality is demonstrated,” Harry Hurley, MD, of the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, told attendees. “However, there was another study showing longer overall survival in IPF patients who receive double lung transplant (DLT) vs. single lung transplant (SLT). So, our question naturally is, is there a benefit to DLT in SARD ILD patients?”
To compare the outcomes of single-lung vs. double-lung transplants among patients with SARD-ILD, Hurley and colleagues conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from the United Network for Organ Sharing. The study comprised procedures that occurred between May 4, 2005, and Dec. 31, 2019.
The analysis included 606 adults (mean age, 54 years; 59% women) with SARD-ILD, 37% of whom had systemic sclerosis. Stratified Cox models — adjusted for characteristics of the donor, recipient and procedure — were used to compare 1-year mortality rates between the two procedures. Some missing covariate data were filled in through multiple imputation.
Overall, 76% of the cohort underwent double-lung transplant. According to the researchers, the unadjusted mortality rates over 1 year were 17.24 per 100 person-years for single-lung transplant and 14.97 for double-lung transplant.
Additionally, single-lung transplant was not associated with significantly increased 1-year mortality vs. double-lung transplant in either the unadjusted model (HR = 1.19; 95% CI, 0.75-1.19) or the fully adjusted model (HR = 1.49; 95% CI, 0.34-6.57).
Mortality risk between the two groups over 1 year “was comparable,” Hurley said.
“This study is the first of its kind to evaluate the effect of single- and double-lung transplant patients in SARD-ILD,” he added. “We were able to control for a large number of possible confounders, and as a result, we believe this is an accurate reflection of modern-day transplant outcomes in SARD-ILD. In the future, we need to prospectively study adult SARD-ILD patients during the transplant eval process to identify modifiable risk factors and thus improve outcomes.”