Read more

March 15, 2022
3 min read
Save

Patients with gut dysbiosis show worse axial SpA disease activity, physical function

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Gut dysbiosis is more frequent in patients with ankylosing spondylitis, compared with controls, and is associated with worse axial spondyloarthritis disease activity and physical function, according to data.

“The link between spondyloarthritis (SpA) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is well recognized,” Jonas Sagard, of Lund University, in Sweden, and colleagues wrote. “IBD patients are at increased risk of developing SpA, and the reverse is likewise true, with prevalence estimates of diagnosed IBD in axial SpA (axSpA) cohorts between 5% and 10%. IBD is associated with an altered intestinal bacteria composition, a condition known as intestinal or gut dysbiosis.

RH0222Sargard_Graphic_01
Gut dysbiosis is more frequent in patients with AS, compared with controls, and are associated with worse axial SpA disease activity and physical function, according to data derived from Sagard J, et al. Arthritis Res Ther. 2022;doi:10.1186/s13075-022-02733-w.

“Recently, several studies have reported gut dysbiosis also in ankylosing spondylitis (AS), whereas little is known about gut microbiota in non-radiographic axSpA (nr-axSpA) patients,” they added. “Furthermore, previous studies have linked intestinal inflammation, assessed either histologically, or estimated via elevated fecal calprotectin (F-calprotectin) levels, to more active axSpA disease and worse prognosis. Yet, it remains largely unknown whether gut microbiota aberrations alone, independent of intestinal inflammation, is associated with more severe axSpA.”

To compare gut dysbiosis frequency between patients with AS and non-radiographic axial SpA, as well as health controls, and to examine whether it is associated with axial SpA disease activity, physical function, mobility and pain, Sagard and colleagues analyzed patients from the population-based SPARTAKUS cohort. According to the researchers, SPARTAKUS includes patients with axial SpA with at least one outpatient rheumatology visit to Skåne University Hospital, in Sweden, from 2011 to 2014.

For their own analysis, Sagard and colleagues assessed the feces of 44 patients with non-radiographic axial SpA and 88 with AS — all without IBD — as well as from 46 healthy control individuals without IBD or any rheumatic disease. Assessments were performed using 16SrRNA analysis. The researchers graded gut microbiome imbalances on a scale of 1 to 5 using the GA-map Dysbiosis Test, with a grade of 3 or greater denoting dysbiosis.

Sagard and colleagues compared proportions of individuals with gut dysbiosis between the groups. They also compared standard measures of axial SpA disease activity, physical function, mobility and pain between patients with AS or axial SpA, with and without dysbiosis, univariately and adjusted for relevant cofounders.

According to the researchers, 36% of patients with AS demonstrated gut dysbiosis, compared with 17% among healthy controls (P = .023). Meanwhile, the proportion of patients with non-radiographic axial SpA who had gut dysbiosis was 25% — not significantly different from either the AS or control groups, they wrote.

In the univariate analysis, most axial SpA measures were significantly worse among patients with gut dysbiosis, compared with those without. Between group differences were 0.6 (95% CI, 0.2-0.9) for ASDAS-CRP; 1.6 (95% CI, 0.8-2.4) for BASDAI; 0.3 (95% CI, 0.1-0.5) for evaluator’s global disease activity assessment, using a Likert scale of 0 to 4; 1.5 (95% CI, 0.6-2.4) for BASFI; and 1.3 (95% CI, 0.4-2.2) for VAS pain.

Differences remained significant after adjusting for demographics, lifestyle factors, treatment, gut inflammation and gut symptoms, save for VAS pain. Neither BASMI nor C-reactive protein were associated with gut dysbiosis.

“In the overall axSpA group (nr-axSpA and AS combined), the presence of gut dysbiosis was independently associated with worse disease activity and physical function, seemingly irrespective of both gut inflammation and ongoing treatments,” Sagard and colleagues wrote. “Further research is needed to assess the validity of these findings also in other axSpA cohorts, as well as to gain a deeper understanding of the connection between gut microbiota and axSpA, and examine whether a causal relationship exists.

“This would offer guidance as to whether targeting the intestine therapeutically, with regard to the luminal microbiota composition and/or mucosal inflammation, could be a relevant approach to try to interfere with axSpA development or mitigate the disease course,” they added. “Nonetheless, the current results add to the steadily growing body of evidence for an important, potentially pathobiological, link between disturbances in gastrointestinal homeostasis and axSpA.”