Fact checked byKristen Dowd

Read more

June 14, 2023
2 min read
Save

Patients with COPD living in socially vulnerable areas have decreased lung function

Fact checked byKristen Dowd
You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Key takeaways:

  • Residing in a socially vulnerable area contributed to reduced lung function in those with COPD.
  • Socioeconomic status, along with household composition and disability, negatively impacted lung function.
Perspective from Nathaniel Marchetti, DO

WASHINGTON — Initial measures of lung function were reduced in patients with COPD who lived in socially vulnerable communities, according to an abstract presented at the American Thoracic Society International Conference.

“The largest contributors to lung function deficits are socioeconomic status and household composition and disability and, with additional negative consequence of housing and transportation and minority status and [language],” Gabriela R. Oates, PhD, associate professor of pediatric pulmonary medicine at The University of Alabama at Birmingham, and colleagues wrote.

COPD
Initial measures of lung function were reduced in patients with COPD who lived in socially vulnerable communities, according to an abstract presented at the American Thoracic Society International Conference. Image: Adobe Stock

In a longitudinal analysis of The University of Alabama at Birmingham Health System between 2010 and 2020, Oates and colleagues evaluated 11,767 patients with COPD to see how baseline pre-bronchodilator lung function and annual changes in lung function are impacted by neighborhood vulnerability.

Researchers evaluated the social vulnerability of a patients’ residence through the CDC Social Vulnerability Index (SVI), which includes 15 variables from the U.S. census to determine if an area is “socially vulnerable to disaster,” according to the CDC website.

Researchers then used multivariable linear mixed models that accounted for age, sex, race, ethnicity, martial status, smoking status, obesity and comorbidities to assess how SVI impacted FEV1 at baseline and over 1 year.

In addition to overall SVI scores, Oates and colleagues evaluated four sub scores from the index to see which was estimated to have the greatest negative effect on lung function. These sub scores specifically captured socioeconomic status; household composition and disability; minority status and language; and housing and transportation.

At least two FEV1 datapoints were found for 6,359 patients (54%), and the mean percent predicted FEV1 at baseline was 69.5% (standard deviation, 23.38), with a mean FEV1 decline of 1.3% over a year, according to the abstract.

Researchers found that overall SVI was linked to a decrease of 6.9% of percent predicted FEV1 at baseline (P < .0001). Further, all the evaluated individual SVI sub scores showed reduced lung function at baseline, with socioeconomic status showing the largest decline of –7.5% (P < .0001), followed by household composition and disability with –5.3% (P < .0001), housing and transportation with –3.9% (P < .0001) and minority status and language with –2.4% (P = .0047).

Overall SVI scores were also related to an annual 0.9% decrease in percent predicted FEV1 (P < .01). In terms of sub scores of neighborhood vulnerability, researchers observed an annual percent predicted FEV1 change of –0.8% linked to socioeconomic status, as well as housing and transportation (P < .01). Minority status and language was also linked to a decrease in lung function over a year (–0.5%; P < .05).

“These risk factors can be used as intervention targets in future research seeking to ameliorate the adverse effects of the social environment on lung health,” Oates and colleagues wrote.

References: