Read more

March 20, 2024
1 min read
Save

Gait retraining programs for cadence, impact may relieve patellofemoral pain

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Key takeaways:

  • A gait retraining program improved pain, knee function and lower limb kinematics in runners with patellofemoral pain.
  • The programs focused on step cadence and impact.

According to published results, a 2-week partially supervised gait retraining program, which focused on cadence and impact, relieved pain and improved knee function and lower limb kinematics in runners with patellofemoral pain.

Researchers performed a randomized controlled trial of 30 runners (aged 18 to 45 years) who presented with patellofemoral pain symptoms between August 2020 and July 2022. Researchers randomly assigned 10 patients to participate in a gait retraining program focused on cadence, 10 patients to participate in a gait retraining program focused on impact and a control group of 10 patients who did not receive any intervention.

running on the treadmill
A gait retraining program improved pain, knee function and lower limb kinematics in runners with patellofemoral pain. Image: Adobe Stock

According to the study, the interventions were partially supervised and lasted for 2 weeks. The cadence group trained to increase step cadence by 7.5% to 10%, while the impact group trained to reduce tibial acceleration by 50%.

Outcomes were assessed before the intervention, immediately after the intervention and at 6 months after the intervention. Outcomes included VAS pain scores, knee functional scores and lower limb kinematics, such as contralateral pelvic drop, hip adduction, knee flexion, ankle dorsiflexion, tibia inclination and foot inclination.

Overall, researchers found both intervention groups had greater improvements in running pain at 6-month follow-up compared with the control group. Researchers noted the impact group had greater improvements in knee functional scores immediately after the intervention compared with the control group. No differences were found between the groups for usual pain or lower limb kinematics.

Researchers concluded by highlighting the differences between the supervised vs. unsupervised portions of the programs.

“Participants in a supervised protocol focusing on tibial acceleration were unable to transfer the results outside the clinic,” the researchers wrote in the study. “These results show the relevance of partially supervised protocols, which allow exposure to outdoor training during retraining,” they added.