Read more

December 06, 2023
1 min read
Save

Preoperative outcome scores may predict relative improvement from rotator cuff repair

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Key takeaways:

  • High preoperative ASES scores were associated with less relative improvement from rotator cuff repair vs. low preoperative scores.
  • However, high preoperative scores should not be a contraindication.

Published results showed high preoperative patient-reported outcome scores may be associated with less relative improvement after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair compared with low preoperative scores.

John R. Martin, MD, and colleagues performed a retrospective comparative prognostic trial using data from 348 patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) between Jan. 1, 2016, and Feb. 1, 2020, with mean follow-up of 1.8 years.

Shoulder doctor
High preoperative ASES scores were associated with less relative improvement from rotator cuff repair. Image: Adobe Stock

According to the study, patients were categorized into two cohorts based on their preoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score: 127 patients with a preoperative ASES score greater than 63 and 221 patients with a preoperative ASES score less than 63. Researchers noted an ASES score of 63 was the optimal cut-off value predictive of achieving substantial clinical benefit.

Martin and colleagues found patients with a preoperative ASES score less than 63 were “significantly more likely” to achieve the minimum clinically important difference (OR = 4.7) and substantial clinical benefit (OR = 6.1) compared with patients with a preoperative ASES score greater than 63. Patients with a score less than 63 also had a higher percent maximum outcome improvement (63% vs. 41%) and change in ASES score (36 vs. 12) compared with patients with a score greater than 63.

However, researchers noted patients with a preoperative ASES score greater than 63 had higher ASES scores at final follow-up (86 vs. 79), higher satisfaction scores (7.4 vs. 6.7) and were more likely to achieve a patient-acceptable symptom state (59% vs. 48%) compared with patients with a score less than 63.

“The data suggest that high preoperative function should not be a contraindication to undergoing RCR,” the researchers wrote in the study.