Read more

September 07, 2023
1 min read
Save

Convolutional neural network measures Cobb angle for patients with idiopathic scoliosis

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Key takeaways:

  • A convolutional neural network accurately measured Cobb angles of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
  • The artificial intelligence method was comparable with manual assessment from six doctors.

Published results showed a convolutional neural network method successfully detected vertebrae and measured Cobb angles on X-ray imaging of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Researchers compared the ability of an artificial intelligence (AI) convolutional neural network to assess Cobb angles on X-ray images of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) vs. two doctors who specialize in scoliosis treatment, two doctors who were spine specialists and two doctors who were in year 3 of their post-graduate studies. According to the study, researchers compared intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) between the groups.

Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
A convolutional neural network method successfully detected vertebrae and measured Cobb angles on X-ray imaging of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Image: Adobe Stock

Overall, the average Cobb angle difference between AI assessment and doctor assessment ranged from 2.8° to 4.6°. The smallest difference was seen on standing X-ray with a minor 2 curve type, while the largest difference was seen on supine side-bending X-ray with a minor 2 curve type. Researchers noted ICCs for both the AI and the doctors were “excellent or good” with ICCs greater than 0.96 on standing X-ray for all curve types.

According to the study, the mean error between the AI and the doctors was not affected by Cobb angle size, with AI measuring 1.7° to 2.2° smaller than that measured by the doctors.

“The proposed method showed a high correlation with the doctors’ measurements, regardless of the [Cobb angle] size, doctors’ experience and patient posture,” the researchers wrote in the study. “The proposed method showed excellent reliability, indicating that it is a promising automated method for measuring [Cobb angle] in patients with AIS,” they concluded.