Read more

July 10, 2023
1 min read
Save

Compared with usual care, risk-stratified care did not improve outcomes for low back pain

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Key takeaways:

  • Researchers wrote that risk-stratified care offers “no obvious benefit” to patients with low back pain.
  • Results were analyzed among a population of patients from the Military Health System.

Compared with conventional care, risk-stratified care did not improve outcome scores for patients from the Military Health System who had low back pain, according to published results.

Researchers performed a parallel-group randomized clinical trial of 270 patients (mean age of 34.1 years) who sought care for low back pain (LBP) from a primary care clinic within the Military Health System (MHS) from April 2017 to February 2020. According to the study, 134 patients received usual care and 136 patients received risk-stratified care. The primary outcome measure was the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire.

Back pain being examined by doctor
Compared with usual care, risk-stratified care offered no improvements for patients with low back pain. Image: Adobe Stock

Among all patients, 7.2% (n = 21) were stratified as high-risk patients. At 1 year, researchers found no significant differences in the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire scores between patients who received usual care vs. risk-stratified (least squares mean ratio: 1). Researchers also found no differences between the care groups for Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System pain or function scores, according to the study.

“These findings suggest that risk-stratified care offers no obvious benefit when implemented in primary care within the MHS,” the researchers wrote in the study.