Read more

July 16, 2022
1 min read
Save

Study: No faster return to sport with blood flow restriction after ACL reconstruction

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

COLORADO SPRINGS, Colo. — Blood flow restriction training compared with standardized physical therapy after ACL reconstruction may not lead to improved return to sport outcomes in elite collegiate athletes, according to data presented here.

“[Blood flow restriction training] BFRT does not improve return to sport times in our division 1 athlete cohort. Our data wasn’t necessarily suggestive of particular postoperative timeframe where BFRT is most effective. Ultimately, we think it is a matter of finding a balance between BFRT and traditional rehab exercises,” Sai K. Devana, MD, said at the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine Annual Meeting.

In a retrospective chart review, Devana and colleagues studied division 1 athletes at University of California, Los Angeles who underwent primary ACL reconstruction. All athletes followed a standardized postoperative rehabilitation protocol based on guidance of the MOON panel. However, one group had the addition of BFRT, which was 80% occlusion pressure. Primary outcome measure was the time to return to sport. Secondary outcome measure was postoperative strength of the quadriceps determined by hand-held dynamometry and measured as a percentage compared with the unaffected extremity.

Sai K. Devana
Sai K. Devana

Researchers found the BFRT group of 22 athletes had a mean return to sport time of 409 ± 134 days from surgery. For 33 athletes who followed the standardized rehabilitation protocol alone, mean return to sport time was 332 ± 100 days. For athletes in the BFRT group, mean quadriceps strength increased 0.67 percentage points for every 1 week of rehabilitation.

Average absolute changes in hand-held dynamometry were calculated in 4-week intervals. Devana said the first significant increase in strength occurred between weeks 13 and 16 at 10%. Athletes had hand-held dynamometry gains relative to baseline over time. However, Devana said, “only 50% of patients got to 90% hand-held dynamometry or higher at the 52-week mark, which is what we typically tell patients in terms of return to sport expectations.”