Teriparatide delivered by robotic pill provides higher bioavailability than injection
Click Here to Manage Email Alerts
Key takeaways:
- Teriparatide administered through the RT-102 pill provided higher bioavailability than injection with no device-related adverse events.
- RT-102 could be used in the future to deliver other subcutaneous drugs.
CHICAGO — An oral robotic pill may provide an alternative delivery method to subcutaneous injection for teriparatide and other biologics, according to a speaker at ENDO 2023.
In findings from a phase 1 trial, women who received the osteoporosis drug teriparatide (Forteo, Eli Lilly) through the RT-102 robotic pill (Rani Therapeutics) had a threefold to fourfold higher relative bioavailability compared with those receiving subcutaneously injected teriparatide, with no pill-related adverse events recorded.
“[This is] a new way to deliver biologics orally,” Arvinder Dhalla, PhD, vice president of clinical development at Rani Therapeutics, said during a press conference. “Data from our phase 1 study showed that parathyroid hormone can be delivered via robotic pill at a bioavailability similar to or higher than subcutaneous injection. To our knowledge, this is the first study showing oral delivery of PTH with such high bioavailability.”
Researchers conducted a phase 1 study at a health clinic in Australia. A cohort of healthy women received either 20 µg of RT-102 (n = 15), 80 µg of RT-102 (n = 14) or 20 µg of subcutaneous teriparatide (n = 10). Fluoroscopic imaging was used to track the deployment and confirm excretion of RT-102. Serum samples were collected over 6 hours to measure drug concentration.
Successful drug delivery was achieved by 75% of women receiving a C version of RT-102 and 95% of those receiving a newer D version of the pill. Women receiving 20 µg RT-102 had about 300% higher bioavailability and those receiving 80 µg RT-102 had about 400% higher relative bioavailability compared with those receiving the subcutaneous injection. The peak concentration of teriparatide was 98 pg/mL in the 20 µg RT-102 group and 971 pg/mL in the 80 µg RT-102 group compared with 128 pg/mL in the subcutaneous teriparatide group. The time it took for the drug to reach peak concentration was 68 minutes in the 20 µg RT-102 group and 60 minutes in the 80 µg RT-102 group compared with 13 minutes with subcutaneous injection.
There were no adverse events reported in the 20 µg RT-102 group, two in the 80 µg RT-102 group and five in the subcutaneous teriparatide group. None of the adverse events were related to RT-102.
“Patients and physicians wait to start Forteo treatment because patients do not like to take injections,” Dhalla said. “We believe that having an oral option as in RT-102 for patients could lead to a wide acceptance to this therapy earlier in the disease progression, where it has the greatest impact.”
Dhalla added that RT-102 is designed for use not only with teriparatide. According to Dhalla, Rani Therapeutics has data on the use of RT-102 with 12 different molecules, including some antibodies. Dhalla said the robotic pill could provide an alternate administration route for a range of subcutaneous drugs.