Fact checked byRichard Smith

Read more

March 20, 2023
2 min read
Save

Tailored treat-to-target strategy feasible vs. high-intensity regimen for CAD

Fact checked byRichard Smith
You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Key takeaways:

  • A treat-to-target statin strategy was noninferior to a high-intensity statin strategy in CAD.
  • The data highlight the need for intensive efforts to attain the target LDL in patients with CAD.

NEW ORLEANS — Among adults with CAD, a treat-to-target LDL strategy of 50 mg/dL to 70 mg/dL was noninferior to a high-intensity statin therapy for the 3-year composite of death, MI, stroke or coronary revascularization, researchers wrote.

The findings provide additional evidence supporting the suitability of a treat-to-target strategy that may allow a tailored approach with consideration for individual variability in drug response to statin therapy, Myeong-Ki Hong, MD, PhD, professor of medicine at Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine in Seoul, South Korea, said during a featured clinical research presentation at the American College of Cardiology Scientific Session.

“Intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol levels with statins is recommended in patients with coronary artery disease; however, a clinically effective strategy for the choice of statin intensity remains unclear,” Hong said during a presentation. “There are two ways: a treat-to-target strategy, in which statin intensity can be titrated to meet a target LDL cholesterol level. The second is where a high-intensity statin strategy can be initiated as well as maintained without monitoring of LDL cholesterol level.”

Myeong-Ki Hong

For the LODESTAR study, Hong and colleagues analyzed data from 4,400 adults with a diagnosis of CAD treated at 12 centers across South Korea, enrolled between September 2016 and November 2019. The mean age of participants was 65.1 years; 27.9% were women.

Researchers randomly assigned participants to the LDL target strategy, with an LDL level between 50 mg/dL and 70 mg/dL as the target (n = 2,200), or high-intensity statin treatment, which consisted of rosuvastatin 20 mg per day or atorvastatin 40 mg per day (n = 2,200).

For this study, the high-intensity statin therapy regimen was regarded as standard therapy and the treat-to-target strategy was considered the experimental therapy, Hong said, with a primary aim of noninferiority regarding clinical outcomes. The primary endpoint was a 3-year composite of death, MI, stroke or coronary revascularization.

The findings were simultaneously published in JAMA.

In the treat-to-target group, moderate-intensity and high-intensity dosing were used in 43% and 54% of participants, respectively. For the overall study period, in the treat-to-target group, statin intensity was uptitrated in 17% of participants, downtitrated in 9% of patients and maintained without changes in 73% of participants. In the treat-to-target group, 53% were taking a high-intensity statin at 1 year, 55% at 2 years and 56% at 3 years; the corresponding rates in the high-intensity statin therapy group were 93%, 91% and 89%, respectively.

At 3 years, the mean LDL level was 69.1 mg/dL in the treat-to-target group and 68.4 mg/dL in the high-intensity statin group (P = .21).

The primary endpoint occurred in 8.1% of the treat-to-target group and 8.7% in the high-intensity statin group, for an absolute difference of –0.6 percentage points (upper boundary of one-sided 97.5% CI, 1.1; P for noninferiority < .001).

In a Q&A session after the presentation, Hong said the data show that there are alternatives for statin prescribing that are safe.

“As a clinician who takes care of outpatients ... we have to think about the safety endpoint,” Hong said. “Even though the guideline recommends high-intensity statin for the outpatient, some patients complain of statin-related muscle symptoms. Some are nervous [to take statins]. We also have to think about adherence. Our study shows an alternative option for the physician.”

Reference: