Fact checked byKristen Dowd

Read more

January 30, 2023
2 min read
Save

Bushfires appear to affect lung function of children with asthma

Fact checked byKristen Dowd
You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Children with asthma exposed to bushfire smoke demonstrated a clinically important 5% mean decrease in forced vital capacity percent predicted, according to a study published in Pediatric Allergy and Immunology.

Perspective from Erika M. Moseson, MD

Carla Rebeca Da Silva Sena, PhD, research associate at The University of Newcastle and pediatric researcher at Hunter Medical Research Institute, and colleagues collected data from 129 children with asthma aged 4 to 16 years who had lung function tests during 212 visits to the outpatient childhood asthma clinic at John Hunter Children’s Hospital in New South Wales, Australia, between January 2019 and April 2020, when 5.5 million hectares of land were affected by wildfires in the state.

Wildfires are one of the results of climate change, with impacts on patients with asthma.
Mean levels of PM2.5 included 35.7 µg/m3 on bushfire days and 8.3 µg/m3 on days that did not have bushfires. Source: Adobe Stock

After collecting data on 36 days with bushfires and 176 days without bushfires, the researchers did not find any differences in Asthma Control Test scores between children tested on both occasions.

Mean levels of particulate matter at the 2.5 µm scale (PM2.5) reached 35.7 µg/m3 (standard deviation [SD], 16.8) on days with bushfires compared with 8.3 µg/m3 (SD, 3.2; P < .001) on days that did not have bushfires.

A mixed model revealed a mean decrease of 5% in forced vital capacity percent (FVC%) predicted among children with asthma who visited the clinic on days with bushfires, but this decrease was ameliorated after 10 minutes with bronchodilator administration (–3; 95% CI, –6.83 to 0.82).

Also, the researchers did not find any significant decrease in FEV1 or in FEV1/FVC ratio percent predicted.

When the researchers examined data from 59 children who had visits on days with and without a bushfire, they found that the bushfire day had comparable effects, although they did not reach significant levels (–4.36; 95% CI, –9.24 to 0.55).

The researchers also found a significant decrease in FVC% predicted (–0.19; 95% CI, –0.301 to –0.048) and FEV1% predicted (–0.14; 95% CI, –0.265 to –0.005) for each microgram per cubic meter increase in mean PM2.5 concentrations on the day of the visit to the clinic when it was measured as a continuous independent variable.

Modeling indicated that exposure to 71.6 µg/m3 of PM2.5 on bushfire days, which the researchers called the highest mean concentration recorded, could lead to a 14% decrease in FVC% predicted and a 10% decrease in FEV1% predicted compared with the mean levels of 8.3 µg/m3 calculated for days without a bushfire.

Based on these findings, the researchers concluded that exposure to bushfires around the time of lung function testing was associated with a clinically important mean decrease of 5% in FVC% precited among children with asthma.