Biologic DMARDs control ICI-associated inflammatory arthritis quicker than methotrexate
Click Here to Manage Email Alerts
Key takeaways:
- Patients treated with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors experienced a shorter time until cancer progression.
- Patients who received methotrexate achieved control of their arthritis more rapidly.
Patients with immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated inflammatory arthritis who receive a biologic DMARD demonstrate quicker arthritis control, but also experience faster cancer progression, vs. methotrexate, according to data.
“In patients with moderate-to-severe [immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated inflammatory arthritis (ICI-IA)], methotrexate (MTX) is often used as a steroid-sparing agent either alone or in combination with a biologic DMARD,” Anne R. Bass, MD, of the Hospital for Special Surgery, and colleagues wrote in the Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. “However, there are no studies comparing the relative safety of different DMARDs.”
To investigate the differences between various drug classes in patients with ICI-IA, Bass and colleagues conducted a retrospective observational study. To be included, patients were required to have a diagnosis of ICI-IA with joint swelling or ICI-associated polymyalgia rheumatica with one or more inflamed peripheral joints. Also, these patients needed to be receiving treatment with a TNF inhibitor, an interleukin (IL)-6 receptor inhibitor, or methotrexate. Patients were excluded from the analysis if they presented with a preexisting autoimmune disease.
The primary outcome was the time from ICI initiation until cancer progression, as defined by the treating oncologist. Second to this was overall survival. Secondary outcomes included the time from DMARD initiation until the arthritis could be defined as controlled. In cases where arthritis grade was not recorded or available for analysis, Bass and colleagues used the Clinical Disease Activity Index scores. If neither score was available, they interpreted notes from patient files to determine severity and disease control.
The analysis included 147 patients. Of those, 33 received TNF inhibitors, 42 received IL-6 inhibitors and 72 received methotrexate. In all cases, the researchers adjusted for the time between ICI initiation and DMARD initiation. Following adjustment, the time to cancer progression was significantly shorter in patients who received TNF inhibitors compared with those who received methotrexate (HR = 3.27; 95% CI, 1.21-8.84).
For patients receiving the IL-6 receptor inhibitor, the hazard ratio was 2.37 (95% CI, 0.94-5.98). In addition, patients who received TNF inhibitors achieved arthritis control more quickly than patients who received methotrexate (HR = 1.91; 95% CI, 1.06-3.45).
“This is the first study to compare the association between the use of biologic and conventional synthetic DMARDs and cancer progression and arthritis control in patients with ICI-IA,” Bass and colleagues wrote. “We demonstrate faster cancer progression with biologic DMARDs compared with MTX, which was significant for [TNF inhibitors] after adjustment for the time from ICI initiation to DMARD start.”
Editor's note: On June 26, 2023, this story was updated to more accurately reflect the nature of the relationship between TNF inhibitors and cancer progression. Healio editors regret the error.