Fact checked byShenaz Bagha

Read more

December 14, 2022
3 min read
Save

EULAR: Workplace support, inclusivity imperative for patients with RMDs

Fact checked byShenaz Bagha
You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

For patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases to maintain healthy work lives, it is essential for workplaces to offer healthy and supportive attitudes and environments, according to new EULAR points to consider.

Perspective from Tien-I Karleen Su, MD

“In nearly all European countries, the work participation gap between people with chronic diseases, especially those with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs), and the general population persists, varying between 10% and 15%,” Annelies Boonen, MD, PhD, of Maastricht University Medical Center, in the Netherlands, and colleagues wrote in the Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. “To bridge the work participation gap, EULAR included in its strategic objectives that ‘By 2023, EULAR’s activities and related advocacy will have increased participation in work by people with RMDs.’”

EULAR infographic
For patients with RMDs to maintain healthy work lives, it is essential for workplaces to offer healthy and supportive attitudes and environments, according to new EULAR points to consider published in in Boonen A, et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2022;doi:10.1136/ard-2022-222678.

“As part of these activities, a task force was assembled to formulate points to consider to support healthy and sustainable paid work participation for people with RMDs,” they added.

To establish the new points to consider, a steering committee, including experts and a patient representative, convened in January 2020. The group established six areas of research for guidance when formulating the document. Some of these included the relevancy of work to clinical outcomes, barriers and facilitators to working, the impact of various interventions, the impactful pieces of the social security system, how work participation rates differ in people with and without disease, and how employers can facilitate patients maintaining work.

Investigators conducted three systematic literature reviews to examine the pertinent research. The first focused on facilitators and barriers to work outcomes. The second investigated prospective studies evaluating non-pharmacological interventions. The third examined rates of work participation among people with and without RMDs. The researchers additionally conducted two surveys. The first asked rheumatology organizations to identify helpful guidelines for this purpose, while the second surveyed large companies about available policies and programs for patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases.

Members of the investigating group established the principles and points following a series of discussions and votes. Consensus for a specific point was reached if more than 75% of participants voted in favor in the first round. In the second round, this fell to 66%, and in a third, to 50%. After finalizing the points, taskforce members rated their levels of agreement for each point on a scale of 0 to 10 via an anonymous online survey.

The group ultimately approved three overarching principles and 11 points to consider. According to the overarching principles, work participation increases self-worth and other important traits, resulting in better overall well-being. In addition, the aim of work-related support should be to optimize working life to assure the best physical and mental health is attainable, and it is a shared responsibility of all society to support patients’ participation in work.

The 11 points to consider are:

  • Patients should be “supported and encouraged” to work if possible while they are of working age.
  • Patients with RMDs should have timely support to prevent long periods of absence.
  • The employment gap can be addressed through cooperation by health professionals, patient organizations and policymakers.
  • Patients with RMDs should be able to voice concerns relating to work-related challenges with their employers.
  • Being consistently present at work is an indicator of future work outcomes.
  • Biopsychosocial framework aspects must be considered when discussing workplace needs for patients with RMDs.
  • Interventions that modify disease demonstrate a positive impact on work participation and should be initiated early.
  • Non-pharmacological interventions can help patients with RMDs prevent absence due to illness.
  • Social security systems should work toward developing policies to promote work sustainability and return-to-work efforts.
  • Healthy workplace attitudes are essential for patients with RMDs to maintain work lives.
  • Employers should promote policies prioritizing inclusivity, flexibility and support for patients with RMDs.

“A vast amount of research evidence points to the decisive role of the workplace in sustainable work for vulnerable persons,” Boonen and colleagues wrote. “While several terms and definitions have been proposed on what constitutes ‘good work,’ a generally agreed upon and (wherever possible) evidence-based working definition is highly needed.”

References:

Van der Zwan R, et al. J Eur Soc Policy. 2021;doi: 10.1177/09589287211002435.