We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.
Interventions to prevent lumbar and thoracic movement restriction in patients with ankylosing spondylitis may require early intervention, as degradation seems to mainly occur in the first years of disease progression, a study found.
“The effect of age on spinal mobility is considerable, and using regression models, Ramiro et al. developed reference centile charts of the progressive age-related decline in spinal mobility among individuals without spinal impairment,” Kristina Hörnberg, RPT, PhD, of Umea University, in the Netherlands, and colleagues wrote in Arthritis Care and Research. “We have previously compared these norm data with that of a large AS study population to describe characteristics over a disease span of 40 years using repeated cross-sectional analyses, and also to define predictors of abnormal spinal mobility.
“Based on the assumption of a linear development of spinal mobility impairment at a group level in AS, we can further understand the content of our data through extended analyses of linear regression models,” they added.
To examine whether loss of spinal mobility occurred linearly in patients with AS, as well as compare AS-related mobility loss with that related to normal aging, Hörnberg and colleagues analyzed disease progression of 141 patients with AS, 30 of whom were women. Patients were followed for a median of 34 years and a total of 9,697 spinal mobility measurements were recorded. Patients recorded at least 10 visits with a treatment duration of at least 5 years, the researchers wrote.
The study included several spinal mobility tests and measurements — lateral spinal flexion (LSF), the 10 cm Schober test (ST10), chest expansion (CE) and cervical rotation (CR) were all assessed. After disease progressed passed a certain point, data were censored following a specific cutoff — 3 cm for LSF, 1 cm for ST10, 2 cm for CE and 10 degrees for CR — to prevent the bias of regression analysis, the authors wrote. Additionally, some data were not recorded for specific patients if they had no restriction of mobility in that measurement.
In all measured variables, the median values in patients with AS were significantly lower than the norm data, according to the researchers. The biggest difference between the normal expected range and that in patients with AS was measured in LSF and ST10. Overall, the reduction in spinal mobility over time stayed close to the anticipated value, except in the case of CR, which degraded at about twice the expected speed. There were no differences in the analysis between men and women.
In addition, the median deviations from individual regression lines were “significantly higher during the early phase of the disease,” with shrinking residuals over the follow-up period in LSF (P = .001) and CE (P > .001), the researchers wrote.
“After the first years of symptoms, a substantial impairment of mobility had occurred in LSF, the ST10, CE and CR,” Hörnberg and colleagues wrote. “Further declines in the LSF, the ST10 and CE were comparable to the age-related decrease seen in the general population. However, a continuous decrease exceeding the normal age-related decline, was seen in CR.
“Mobility restrictions related to AS seem to mainly occur during the first years of disease, which was before our data collection was initiated,” they added. “Our results indicate that measures taken to try to prevent lumbar and thoracic mobility restrictions would have to be introduced early in the course of the disease.”