August 01, 2012
1 min read
Save

Rituximab outperformed second TNF-a blocker for rheumatoid arthritis patients

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Rituximab was more effective than a second tumor necrosis factor-alpha blocker therapy in treating patients with rheumatoid arthritis after an initial tumor necrosis factor-alpha blocker failed, a study has discovered.

Researchers studied 196 patients (44 men) with rheumatoid arthritis and a Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) of at least 3.2 who had used a tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-a) blocker. Patients were followed for more than 6 months after switching to rituximab (90 patients) or a second TNF-a blocker (etanercept, adalimumab or infliximab). Because it was a noninterventional study, treatments were not randomized and data was unavailable as to which therapy patients were assigned. Inadequate response was the most frequent reason (79.1%) for changing the first TNF-a blocker, followed by intolerable side effects (11.2%).

Patients using rituximab had a significantly lower DAS28 (−1.64; 95% CI, −1.92 to 1.36) vs. the cohort using the second TNF-a blocker (−1.19; 95% CI, −1.42 to −0.96) (P=.013). Patients who were seropositive for rheumatoid factor (−1.66 vs. −1.17; P=.018) and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) antibodies (−1.75 vs. −1.06; P=.002) indicated even stronger differences. Thirty percent of the rituximab cohort showed good European League Against Rheumatism response compared with 15% of the second TNF-a group (22.2% vs. 34.9%, respectively, showed no response).

“The current study showed that anti-CCP positivity, in particular, could be a useful predictive marker of rituximab in patients with prior TNF-a blocker treatment failure,” the researchers concluded. “Further attention should be given to concomitant therapies, such as other [disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs] potentially influencing the response to biologics in different ways.”

Disclosure: The study was funded by Roche Pharma AG (Grenzach-Wyhlen, Germany).