Increased rain, snowfall may lead to airway inflammation in adolescents
Click Here to Manage Email Alerts
Key takeaways:
- A higher 7-day moving average for precipitation resulted in greater fractional exhaled nitric oxide.
- Adolescents with vs. without asthma had more airway inflammation with increases in average rain/snowfall.
Among adolescents, increases in average rain or snowfall over a week resulted in heightened fractional exhaled nitric oxide, signaling airway inflammation, according to results published in Annals of the American Thoracic Society.
“Greater short-term precipitation may trigger airway inflammation in adolescents, particularly among those with asthma,” Nicholas J. Nassikas, MD, of the division of pulmonary, critical care and sleep medicine at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, and colleagues wrote.
Nassikas and colleagues analyzed 1,019 (mean age, 13.2 years; 49.7% girls; 64.4% white) early adolescents from the northeast U.S. in a prospective prebirth cohort study to find out if 1-, 2-, 3- and 7-day moving averages of precipitation the week before an assessment impacted lung function or airway inflammation, measured by fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO). They also tested to see if asthma changed these findings.
Researchers looked for links between the two factors through linear regression models that accounted for sex, race/ethnicity, diagnosis of ever asthma, age, height, weight, maternal education and household income, prevalence of household smoking, date, season and moving averages for mean daily temperature.
Primary finding
During the time span before the assessment, researchers observed a median daily precipitation of 2 mm.
For all precipitation moving averages, researchers did not find any significant links between these averages and measures of lung function (FEV1 and FVC). In contrast, FeNO went up by 2.1% (95% CI, 0.2%-4%) when the 3-day moving precipitation average increased by 2 mm per day and by 4% (95% CI, 1.1%-6.9%) when the 7-day moving average was heightened by 2 mm per day.
Additional adjustment for air pollutants and relative humidity did not change this finding, according to researchers.
Secondary findings
Among those with an asthma diagnosis (26.1%), researchers found that each 2 mm increase in average 3-day moving precipitation resulted in a greater percentage of FeNO than those without an asthma diagnosis (5.8%; 95% CI, 1.8%-9.9% vs. 1%; 95% CI, –1.2% to 3.2%; P = .04).
In terms of lung function, adolescents with vs. without asthma had poorer FEV1 with every 2 mm per day increase in 2-day (–12.2 mL; 95% CI, –29.4 to 4.9 vs. 8.4 mL; 95% CI, –1.8 to 18.6; P = .04) and 3-day (–13 mL; 95% CI, –33.5 to 7.5 vs. 8.8 mL; 95% CI, –2.7 to 20.2) moving precipitation averages.
Researchers observed comparable findings when evaluating FVC, with asthmatics having decreased FVC with every 2 mm per day rise in 1-day (–15.6 mL; 95% CI, –28.1 to –3.1 vs. 7.2 mL; 95% CI, –0.7 to 15.1; P < .01), 2-day (–16.2 mL; 95% CI, –34.3 to 1.9 vs. 9.7 mL; 95% CI, –1.1 to 20.5; P = .02) and 3-day (–16.6 mL; 95% CI, –38.3 to 5 vs. 8.2 mL; 95% CI, –4 to 20.3) precipitation moving averages compared with those without asthma.
Aeroallergen sensitization (immunoglobulin E [IgE] > 0.35 IU/mL) was found in 58% of those who had this measurement (n = 638). Notably, those with vs. without outdoor aeroallergen sensitization (IgE against common ragweed, oak, ryegrass or silver birch) had a greater percentage of FeNO when the 3-day precipitation moving average was heightened by 2 mm per day (5.1%; 95% CI, 0.9-9.5 vs. 0.7%; 95% CI, –1.9 to 3.4).
Researchers also observed that girls had higher FeNO (6.9%; 95% CI, 2.7-11.3) with every 2 mm per day rise in the 7-day moving average of precipitation vs. boys (1.4%; 95% CI, –2.5 to 5.3).
“In the Northeast, increases in annual total precipitation and extreme precipitation events are expected in the future as a result of climate change,” Nassikas and colleagues wrote. “Determining if differences in exposure to precipitation are associated with acute changes in lung function and airway inflammation, especially in higher-risk groups such as asthma, will inform public health measures and may provide valuable information for counseling families about the risks of environmental exposures.”
Implications
This study by Nassikas and colleagues adds to growing literature on the health impacts of climate change and suggests the need for more studies on this topic to protect adolescents, patients with asthma and those who are sensitized to outdoor allergens, according to an accompanying editorial by Melissa Pavelack, DO, pediatrician and pediatric critical care fellow at Johns Hopkins University, and Meredith C. McCormack, MD, MHS, associate director of the division of pulmonary and critical care medicine at Johns Hopkins University.
“In the era of personalized medicine, one can envision anticipatory strategies to increase or initiate medications when rain or snowfall is expected to be large, especially during cold wind fronts or high-pollen days,” Pavelack and McCormack wrote. “Asthma action plans and allergy visits might incorporate thunderstorm asthma guidance. Evidence of efficacy is needed to support putting such programs into widespread practice. Intervention studies are needed to adapt to the impact of climate change and protect respiratory health, particularly for susceptible populations such as individuals with asthma, and the Project Viva study has provided valuable insights to lead the way.”