Read more

July 15, 2024
1 min read
Save

Cam over-resection more common than under-resection in failed hip arthroscopy

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Key takeaways:

  • In 2010, the ratio of under-resection to over-resection for revision hip arthroscopy was 4:1.
  • By 2020, the ratio flipped in favor of over-resection to 2.3:1.

DENVER — Results presented here showed cam over-resection has become more than twice as common as cam under-resection among patients presenting for failed hip arthroscopy.

“We know that over-resections predict poorer outcomes and are difficult to fix and, hence, are something we want to avoid,” Benjamin G. Domb, MD, founder and chair of the American Hip Institute, said in his presentation at the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine Annual Meeting. “We should teach our fellows and residents caution and meticulousness in performing a surgical femoroplasty.”

Hip infection
Cam over-resection has become more than twice as common as cam under-resection among patients presenting for failed hip arthroscopy. Image: Adobe Stock

To determine the prevalence of femoral resection types over time, Domb and colleagues retrospectively analyzed data for 622 hips from patients undergoing revision hip arthroscopy for residual femoroacetabular impingement between February 2008 and June 2022.

Benjamin G. Domb
Benjamin G. Domb

Domb and colleagues defined over-resection as a resection measuring 5% or more of the femoral head diameter, under-resection as a resection with an alpha angle greater than 60° and neutral resection as a resection with an alpha angle less than 60° without over-resection.

Domb said mean prevalence rates were 48% for neutral resection, 31% for under-resection and 21% for over-resection from 2008 to 2022. According to Domb, during the time period, under-resection decreased significantly while neutral resection and over-resection both increased significantly.

“The steadily decreasing under-resection was negatively correlated with the increasing over-resection and neutral resections,” Domb said. “The ratio of under-resection to over-resection reversed entirely. It was four to one more under-resections in 2010, [and] it was greater than two to one more over-resections in 2020.”