Read more

September 02, 2022
4 min watch
Save

VIDEO: Aseptic revision TJA had 5% incidence of unexpected positive sonication cultures

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Researchers at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center found a 5% incidence of unexpected positive sonication cultures with at least five colony-forming units in patients undergoing presumed aseptic revision total joint arthroplasty.

“The goals of this study were threefold: first, to report our rate of unexpected positive cultures; secondly, to report on how we are treating these patients and; lastly, to compare the rates of failure for patients with and without unexpected positive sonication cultures,” Alan Wilson, MD, a fifth-year resident at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, told Healio in a video interview about results presented at the Musculoskeletal Infection Society Annual Meeting.

In a retrospective chart review for 424 patients who underwent presumed aseptic revision hip or knee arthroplasty from 2016 to 2019, Wilson noted 21% of patients had positive sonication cultures, which included patients with a single colony-forming unit.

“When we looked more closely at patients who had at least five colony-forming units, which we have previously reported is the optimal threshold for defining a positive result at our institution, we found a combined incidence of 5%,” Wilson said.

He added unexpected positive cultures were more commonly found among patients with a history of prior revision surgery or patients with a prior periprosthetic joint infection. Among 208 patients who had at least 1 year of follow-up data, patients with and those without unexpected positive cultures had no significant differences in rates of repeat revision or treatment for infection, according to Wilson.

“However, there was a significant loss to follow-up that limits the interpretation of these outcomes,” Wilson said.