Read more

June 21, 2022
1 min read
Save

Robotic-assisted THA provides more reliable cup positioning, stability vs. manual THA

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Compared with manual total hip arthroplasty, robotic-assisted THA produced more reliable cup positioning and offered superior protection against dislocation and revision, according to published results.

In a three-surgeon cohort study, Jonathan H. Shaw, MD, and colleagues analyzed 1,724 patients who underwent manual primary THA (M-THA) and 523 patients who underwent robotic-assisted primary THA (R-THA) between January 2014 and June 2020 at a single hospital.

OT0622Shaw_Graphic_01
All cases of dislocation after R-THA were successful with conservative treatment without recurrence, while 46% of cases of dislocation after M-THA required revision for recurrent instability. Data were derived from Shaw JH, et al. J Arthroplasty. 2022;doi:10.1016/j.arth.2022.02.002.

Researchers used the Michigan Arthroplasty Registry Collaborative Quality Initiative to assess outcome measures, such as dislocation, instability, revision, readmissions, 90-day complication rates and ED visits. Additionally, researchers performed multivariate regression analysis on a representative, randomized sample of 368 anteroposterior pelvis radiographs taken after THA to assess acetabular implant positioning. According to the study, average follow-up was 4 years (minimum follow-up of 6 months).

Jonathan H. Shaw
Jonathan H. Shaw

Shaw and colleagues found significantly lower rates of dislocation in the R-THA cohort (0.6%) compared with the M-THA cohort (2.5%). All cases of dislocation after R-THA were successful with conservative treatment without recurrence, while 46% of cases of dislocation after M-THA required revision for recurrent instability.

Of the 368 sample radiographs included for cup position analysis, 141 were cases of R-THA and 227 were cases of M-THA. Researchers found cup anteversion was 25.6° after R-THA compared with 20.6° after M-THA, while cup inclination was 42.5° after R-THA compared with 47° after M-THA.

“R-THA resulted in less than one-fourth the dislocation rate compared to M-THA and no revision for instability. It was associated with no difference in [patient-reported outcome measures] PROMs or other early complications,” the researchers wrote in the study. “It adds to the literature that R-THA continues to produce reliable cup positioning that could contribute to this cohort's decreased dislocation rate,” they wrote.