Read more

February 08, 2022
1 min read
Save

Presenter: High failure rates of irrigation, debridement alone do not support its use

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

TAMPA, Fla. — Periprosthetic joint infection treated with debridement, antibiotics, irrigation and implant retention resulted in a three times higher failure rate than when these measures were used along with modular component exchange.

At the Orthopaedic Research Society Annual Meeting, Anirudh Buddhiraju, MBBS, presented findings of a retrospective study of 115 patients with acute periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Of these patients, 36 had total hip arthroplasty and 79 had total knee arthroplasty. The mean follow-up was 2.8 years.

In a recorded presentation, he said the patients’ infected joints were treated with debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) with or without a modular component exchange.

Anirudh Buddhiraju
Anirudh Buddhiraju

Among the findings was an overall 26% failure rate among patients with PJI. The failure rate for THA was 19.4% and the failure rate for TKA was 29.1%, Buddhiraju said, noting “PJI is a dreaded complication.”

However, the key take-home from the study was the 63.6% failure rate with DAIR alone, as well as a 22.2% failure rate with DAIR and the inclusion of modular component exchange.

“DAIR alone should not be recommended for the treatment of acute PJI, but must always be accompanied by modular component exchange, which may reduce the future prevalence of revision THA,” Buddhiraju said.

According to the abstract, patients in the groups who underwent DAIR vs. DAIR with modular component exchange were fairly equally matched.