Read more

October 20, 2020
2 min read
Save

Similar THA results seen with arthroplasty surgeons vs other orthopedic subspecialists

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Study results show no difference in value of care or acute outcomes for patients with hip fractures who underwent total hip arthroplasty by a fellowship-trained adult reconstruction surgeon compared with other orthopedic subspecialists.

Perspective from Jonathan Danoff, MD

In a multicenter, retrospective cohort study, researchers from Duke University Hospital analyzed data for 291 patients with hip fractures who were treated at two centers with THA from June 2013 to February 2018. To assess the value of care for patients undergoing THA, researchers compared acute outcomes of 120 patients who underwent surgery performed by a fellowship-trained adult reconstruction surgeon and 171 patients who underwent surgery performed by a non-arthroplasty subspecialist.

According to the study, acute patient outcomes included OR time, length of stay (LOS), disposition to home vs. an inpatient facility and 90-day readmissions. Patient demographic data, as well as American Society of Anesthesiologists score, were also factored into the outcomes.

Investigators found no significant difference in any of the outcome variables between the two cohorts. Additionally, compared with other subspecialists, arthroplasty surgeons were not more likely to reduce 90-day readmissions and LOS or dispose a patient home, according to the study.

“In light of the high cost of care, CMS has chosen to include hip fractures as part of bundled initiatives in an effort to increase the value of care,” the researchers wrote in the study. “Rather than focusing on the availably of arthroplasty surgeons, hospitals should concentrate on expeditious surgical intervention and appropriate perioperative care for this vulnerable patient population,” as other orthopedic subspecialists can achieve comparable outcomes.