February 10, 2020
3 min read
This article is more than 5 years old. Information may no longer be current.
More resources used for physical therapy for adhesive capsulitis vs watchful waiting
Paul F. Abraham
PHOENIX — Watchful waiting was shown to have possible noninferiority to physical therapy as treatment for patients with adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder, based on results of a study presented at the Orthopaedic Research Society Annual Meeting, here.
Furthermore, presenter Paul F. Abraham, BS, said, concerning value-based care, a survey showed patient-incurred costs 12 months after each intervention were greater in the physical therapy (PT) group vs. the watchful waiting group.
He presented results of the interim analysis performed for the 12 patients in the PT arm and the 13 patients in the watchful waiting arm of the study who reached 12-month follow-up. Abraham said patients in both groups were offered corticosteroid injection as needed, and as clinically indicated.
Both groups experienced significantly increased American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores and decreased DASH scores. All patients were also satisfied with their treatments according to the patient-reported outcome measures used, the study showed.
“ASES improvement at 3 months was greater in PT than in watchful waiting, ... but there was no difference at any other timepoint, including at 6 months and 12 months,” Abraham said. “There was no difference in pain improvement between arms throughout the study period either,” he said.
Patients’ average costs were $6,150 for the physical therapy group and $180 for the watchful waiting group, which was a statistically significant difference.
Abraham said, “The clinical take-home of this study is that watchful waiting is equal to PT in the long term in treatment for adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder, but more data are still required to be certain. PT costs are greater than watchful waiting costs, indicating that PT may have a substantially lower value of care than watchful waiting.” – by Susan M. Rapp
Reference:
Abraham PF, et al. Paper 128. Presented at: Orthopaedic Research Society Annual Meeting; Feb. 8-11, 2020; Phoenix.
Disclosure: Abraham reports no relevant financial disclosures.
Perspective
Back to Top
Grant L. Jones, MD
I reviewed with great interest the presentation by Paul F. Abraham, BS, from Massachusetts General Hospital, on the effectiveness of physical therapy compared with watchful waiting for the treatment of adhesive capsulitis at the Orthopaedic Research Society Annual Meeting.
Adhesive capsulitis is a debilitating condition of insidious onset characterized by the initial onset of pain followed by the progressive loss of motion. Fortunately, in a majority of patients, it is a self-limiting disease which resolves without surgical intervention. Unfortunately, the “thawing process” can often be prolonged, so multiple interventions have been suggested and studied to expedite the recovery. One treatment option is formal physical therapy (PT) to help regain motion and decrease the length of disability. Abraham and his colleagues utilized a randomized controlled trial to evaluate whether PT provided any benefit over watchful waiting. They found patients in both the PT and watchful waiting groups demonstrated significant improvement in passive range of motion and VAS pain scores with no differences between the groups at 6 months and 12 months. Furthermore, the average costs per patient in the PT group was $6,150.46 vs. $180.00 in the watchful waiting group. The authors concluded watchful waiting is not inferior to PT in terms of patient outcomes, but it is much less expensive; therefore, watchful waiting should be considered the treatment of choice for adhesive capsulitis.
The strength of this study is that it was a prospective randomized controlled trial, for which the authors should be commended. However, there were a few weakness with the investigation including that there were a low number of patients, which raises the possibility of the study not being adequately powered to detect differences and there were confounders which were not controlled, such as which patients received corticosteroid injections, which have been shown to expedite the recovery. Overall, the study is impactful in that it demonstrates that formal PT may not be necessary to treat adhesive capsulitis, which could result in a significant reduction in treatment costs. This is important in the present health care environment of cost containment. However, studies that have a larger cohort of patients and which control for variables, like injections, are necessary to confirm results of the study.
Grant L. Jones, MD
Professor, department of orthopaedic surgery
Team physician, department of athletics
The Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio
Disclosures: Jones reports he is on the medical board of directors for Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation and received a research grant from OrthoSpace.
February 20, 2023
1 min read
February 20, 2023
1 min read
February 17, 2023
1 min read
February 17, 2023
1 min read
February 15, 2023
1 min read
February 15, 2023
1 min read
February 13, 2023
2 min watch
February 13, 2023
2 min watch
February 13, 2023
2 min watch