Read more

October 10, 2023
1 min read
Save

Minority enrollment still low in ophthalmic clinical trials after Final Rule implemented

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Race and ethnicity disclosures in clinical trials increased significantly after implementation of the Final Rule, but no progress was seen in the enrollment of minority groups, according to a poster presentation at Real World Ophthalmology.

The Final Rule for Clinical Trials Registration and Results Information Submission was issued by the Department of Health and Human Services in 2016 to clarify and expand the requirements for data that must be submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov. These include information on participants’ race and ethnicity, which were typically underreported in ophthalmic clinical trials.

Graphic distinguishing meeting news
Race and ethnicity disclosures in clinical trials increased significantly after implementation of the Final Rule, but no progress was seen in the enrollment of minority groups, according to a poster presentation at Real World Ophthalmology.

A search conducted on ClinicalTrials.gov on 558 trials completed before and 314 trials completed after implementation of the Final Rule showed that the race disclosure rate increased from 26.16% pre-requirement to 84.39% post-requirement. The ethnicity disclosure rate similarly increased from 16.85% to 55.73%.

However, there was no significant change in enrollment of minorities before and after the requirements. After implementation of the Final Rule, enrollment of white subjects remained higher and enrollment of Hispanic subjects remained lower in trials that were not funded by the NIH as compared with NIH-funded trials.

“Stronger legislation that requires enrollment of minority groups and subsequent demographic information reporting, independent of sponsor type and coupled with thorough monitoring of compliance, should be considered to improve diversity in ophthalmic clinical trials,” the authors wrote.