Read more

December 12, 2024
2 min read
Save

Novel agent ‘highly efficient’ in HER2-positive breast cancer

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Key takeaways:

  • Researchers reported an encouraging pathologic complete response rate with SHR-A1811 monotherapy.
  • No treatment-related deaths occurred during the study.

SAN ANTONIO — The novel antibody-drug conjugate SHR-A1811 exhibited promising antitumor activity as neoadjuvant treatment for patients with HER2-positive breast cancer, according to data presented at San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium.

The agent also exhibited a manageable safety profile.

Graphic distinguishing meeting news
Results showed pCR rates of 63% with SHR-A1811 monotherapy, 62% with SHR-A1811 plus pyrotinib, and 66% with PCbHP.

“This is the first study to report a third-generation HER2-directed antibody-drug conjugate in the neoadjuvant treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer,” Jun-Jie Li, MD, of Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, said during a presentation. “SHR-A1811 monotherapy is highly efficient and well tolerated.”

Background and methods

Standard neoadjuvant regimens for HER2-positive breast cancer include trastuzumab (Herceptin, Genentech), pertuzumab (Perjeta, Genentech) and chemotherapy.

A prior phase 1 study showed SHR-A1811 (Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals) had antitumor activity among patients with heavily pretreated HER2-expressing or mutated advanced solid tumors. Results showed an objective response rate of 59.9%, with higher ORRs among patients with HER2-positive breast cancer (76.3%) and HER2 low-expressing breast cancer (60.4%).

No data exists on the efficacy and safety of HER2-directed antibody-drug conjugates (ADC) alone or in combination with tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the neoadjuvant setting.

The randomized phase 2 FASCINATE-N trial included 265 patients with early-stage or locally advanced HER2-positive breast cancer. All patients had primary tumor size of at least 2 cm, left ventricular ejection fraction of at least 55%, and ECOG performance of 0 or 1.

Researchers randomly assigned patients 1:1:1 to one of three regimens.

One group (n = 87) received 4.8 mg/kg SHR-A1811 via IV once every 3 weeks for eight cycles. A second group (n = 88) received 4.8 mg/kg SHR-A1811 via IV once every 3 weeks plus 240 mg oral pyrotinib (Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals) once daily for eight cycles. A third group (n = 90) received PCbHP, a regimen that consisted of 100 mg/m2 nab-paclitaxel (days 1, 8 and 21 of 28-day cycles), carboplatin area under the curve 1.5 (days 1, 8 and 21 of 28-day cycles), trastuzumab (initial dose, 8 mg/kg IV; subsequent doses, 6 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks) and pertuzumab (initial dose, 840 mg IV; subsequent doses, 420 mg IV every 3 weeks) for six cycles.

Pathologic complete response (pCR) in the intention-to-treat population served as the primary endpoint.

The majority (70%) of the cohort had stage III disease and 45% had hormone receptor-positive disease.

At SABCS, Li reported data related to antitumor activity and safety.

Results, next steps

Results showed pCR rates of 63% with SHR-A1811 monotherapy, 62% with SHR-A1811 plus pyrotinib, and 66% with PCbHP.

Subgroup analysis of patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer showed pCR rates of 44% with SHR-A1811 monotherapy, 44% with SHR-A1811 plus pyrotinib, and 54% with PCbHP.

Among patients with hormone receptor-negative breast cancer, results showed pCR rates of 76% with SHR-A1811 monotherapy, 76% with SHR-A1811 plus pyrotinib, and 75% with PCbHP.

Grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred more frequently with SHR-A1811 plus pyrotinib (72%) than SHR-A1811 monotherapy (45%) or PCbHP (34%).

One patient who received SHR-A1811 monotherapy developed grade 2 interstitial lung disease, and 9% of individuals who received SHR-A1811 with pyrotinib developed grade 3 diarrhea.

No treatment-related deaths occurred during the study.

“The standard four-drug regimen is highly effective, with a pCR rate around 65%,” Li said. “With comparable efficacy, SHR-A1811 might serve as a backbone and combination with targeted therapies. [In] my opinion, maybe one can substitute for four, and then add more.”

References: