Adding radiation therapy to sorafenib extends survival in advanced liver cancer
Click Here to Manage Email Alerts
The addition of stereotactic body radiation therapy to sorafenib extended OS among patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, results of the randomized phase 3 NRG Oncology/RTOG 1112 trial showed.
Data from the study — presented at American Society for Radiation Oncology Annual Meeting — revealed that radiation before sorafenib also delayed tumor progression without compromising a patient’s quality of life.
In addition, researchers observed benefit in patients with microvasculature invasion, who have traditionally been the hardest to treat.
Background
Hepatocellular carcinoma is “perhaps a neglected cancer,” according to Laura A. Dawson, MD, FRCPC, FASTRO, professor of radiation oncology at University of Toronto and practicing radiation oncologist at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre.
“It is one of the leading causes of global cancer death, and its incidence is on the rise in North America,” she said during a news briefing.
Systemic care is the current standard for patients with HCC ineligible for surgical resection or invasive therapies, Dawson noted.
Integration of radiation therapy into management of HCC has been studied for decades but with mixed results that lack data to demonstrate improvements in survival, she added.
The NRG Oncology/RTOG 1112 trial examined the role of SBRT in the treatment of HCC and whether it could improve outcomes when provided in combination with systemic therapy.
Methodology
The multicenter NRG Oncology/RTOG 1112 trial enrolled 193 patients (median age, 66 years; range, 27-84) with newly diagnosed or relapsed advanced HCC who were ineligible for tumor resection or other standard therapies because of certain clinical factors or their cancer returning after standard therapy.
Patient accrual occurred from April 2013 to March 2021, with 177 patients eligible for the final analysis.
Investigators randomly assigned patients in a 1:1 ratio to receive either sorafenib (Nexavar, Bayer) dosed at 400 mg twice daily (n = 92) or SBRT plus sorafenib dosed at 200 mg twice daily and increased to 400 mg twice after 28 days if appropriate (n = 85).
The patients in the SBRT group received 27.5 Gy to 50 Gy in five fractions over 5 to 10 days, with total doses tailored to a patient’s clinical factors.
Forty-one percent of patients had hepatitis C, whereas 19% had hepatitis B or concurrent hepatitis B and hepatitis C.
OS served as the study’s primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints included PFS, time to disease progression (TTP) and safety.
Median follow-up was 13.2 months, with a data cutoff date of July 1.
Key findings
The combination of SBRT plus sorafenib increased median OS to 15.8 months (90% CI, 11.4-19.2) compared with 12.3 months (90% CI, 10.6, 14.3) among those who received sorafenib alone (HR = 0.77; 95% CI, 0.59-1.01).
Investigators found significant improvement in OS for those who received SBRT plus sorafenib after controlling for clinical factors (HR = 0.72; 95% CI, 0.52-0.99). They also reported significant improvement with the combination vs. sorafenib alone in median PFS (9.2 months vs. 5.5 months; HR = 0.55; 95% CI, 0.4-0.75) and median TTP (18.5 months vs. 9.5 months; HR = 0.69; 95% CI, 0.48-0.99).
The two groups had similar rates of adverse events, with 42% in the sorafenib group experiencing grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events compared with 47% in the sorafenib-plus-SBRT group. One treatment-related patient death occurred in the sorafenib monotherapy group.
Clinical implications
The results showed that SBRT before sorafenib improves key outcomes among patients with advanced HCC compared with sorafenib alone. This improvement occurred without any increase in serious treatment-related adverse events, Dawson added.
“This study adds to the evolving data on the benefits of radiation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma,” she told the audience. “SBRT should be added to the toolkit of standard treatment options for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, with the largest benefit seen among patients with vascular invasion, who are particularly challenging to treat.”