Fact checked byRichard Smith

Read more

December 09, 2022
2 min read
Save

Glucose management indicator may be calculated with as little as 7 days of CGM data

Fact checked byRichard Smith
You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Glucose management indicator — an estimate of HbA1c based on continuous glucose monitoring information — may be accurately calculated for adults with type 1 or type 2 diabetes using as few as 7 days of CGM data, according to researchers.

“Minimal differences were observed between glucose management indicator (GMI) computed using 14 days of data compared with GMI computed with 7 days,” Peter Calhoun, PhD, a biostatistician at the Jaeb Center for Health Research in Tampa, Florida, and colleagues wrote in a brief report published in Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics. “Larger differences were present when GMI was based on 5 or fewer days.”

Difference between GMI and CGM data minimal at 10 days and 7 days vs. 14 days.
Data were derived from Bailey R, et al. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2022;doi:10.1089/dia.2022.0284.

Calhoun and colleagues conducted an analysis from five clinical trials: REPLACE-BG T1D, HypoDE T1D, DIAMOND T1D, DIAMOND T2D and MOBILE T2D. Participants in the trials with at least 14 days of CGM data in the 20 days before outcome visits at 6 or 8 months were included. All five trials used the Dexcom G4, G5 or G6 sensors. GMI was computed for each participant using 14 days of data. Researchers also computed GMI using 1 to 13 days of data. Absolute differences in GMI values and Pearson correlation coefficients between the 14-day GMI and GMI calculated with 1 to 13 days of data were computed.

Data from 581 adults were included in the analysis (mean age, 49 years; mean HbA1c, 7.3%); 435 had type 1 diabetes and 146 had type 2 diabetes. The 14-day GMI was strongly correlated with 10 days of data (r = 0.98) and 7 days of data (r = 0.95). Correlation was lower with 5 days of data (r = 0.91) and 3 days of data (r = 0.86).

The mean absolute difference in GMI was 0.08% between 14 days and 10 days of data, 0.13% between 14 days and 7 days of data, 0.17% between 14 days and 5 days of data and 0.24% between 14 days and 3 days of data. The proportion of GMI values within 0.3% of the 14-day GMI reading was 98% with 10 days of data, 87% with 7 days of data, 77% with 5 days of data and 60% with 3 days of data.

“Analyses only included adult participants wearing a real-time CGM, but we expect results to generalize to other participants assuming that the CGM data were collected during a period of stable glucose control,” the researchers wrote. “These data indicate that a reasonable estimate of HbA1c with the GMI can be obtained with 7 days of CGM data in ambulatory glucose profile reports, although 14 or more days is preferred.”