Fact checked byRichard Smith

Read more

October 06, 2023
2 min read
Save

Indirect factors worsened survival of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest during pandemic

Fact checked byRichard Smith
You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Key takeaways:

  • Out-of-hospital cardiac arrests rose 19% during the COVID-19 pandemic.
  • Pandemic-related changes in response and care, not COVID-19 itself, likely impacted patient deaths.

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrests rose by 19% during the COVID-19 pandemic in King County, Washington, yet data suggest pandemic-related changes in emergency medical services response and care — not the virus itself — affected survival.

Little is known about how COVID-19 affected out-of-hospital cardiac arrest incidence and outcomes and the increase in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest incidence may be directly attributed to complications of SARS-CoV-2 infection, Jennifer Z. Liu, MPH, of the emergency medical services (EMS) division of Public Health-Seattle & King County, and colleagues wrote in the study background.

Graphical depiction of data presented in article
Data were derived from Liu JZ, et al. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.36992.

Alternatively, the pandemic may affect out-of-hospital cardiac arrest incidence via indirect factors, such as people delaying preventive care or SARS-CoV-2 infection rendering patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest more refractory to treatment.

“Alternatively, the pandemic may have produced more generalized challenges independent of patient-specific infection, such as altering societal behaviors or clinical practice, thereby changing out-of-hospital cardiac arrest circumstances or hindering rescuer efforts,” Liu and colleagues wrote in JAMA Network Open. “A better understanding of the potential factors by which COVID-19 may have influenced out-of-hospital cardiac arrest incidence and patient outcomes has important implications for how to best prevent and treat pandemic-related health challenges, specifically out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.”

In a retrospective study conducted in Seattle and King County, Washington, Liu and colleagues analyzed data from 13,081 adults with a nontraumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest attended by EMS from 2018 to 2021. The primary outcomes were out-of-hospital cardiac arrest incidence and survival to hospital discharge. Researchers used mediation analysis to determine the percentage change in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest incidence and outcomes between pre-pandemic and pandemic periods that was attributable to acute SARS-CoV-2 infection vs. conventional circumstances and resuscitation care (bystander CPR, early defibrillation and EMS response intervals).

Within the cohort, 5,979 adults were alive when treated by EMS. Among the EMS-treated patients, the median age was 64 years; 64.6% were men and 17.2% survived to hospital discharge.

Patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest increased by 19%, from 5,963 during the prepandemic period to 7,118 during the pandemic period, corresponding to an incidence increase from 168.8 per 100,000 person-years to 195.3 events per 100,000 person-years.

Among the EMS-treated patients during the pandemic period, 6.2% were acutely infected with SARS-CoV-2, compared with 3.7% of EMS-attended but untreated patients.

Using a time-series correlation analysis, researchers observed a positive correlation between community SARS-CoV-2 incidence and overall out-of-hospital cardiac arrest incidence (r = 0.27; P = .01), as well as out-of-hospital cardiac arrest incidence with acute SARS-CoV-2 infection (r = 0.43; P < .001).

The survival rate during the pandemic period was lower than that in the pre-pandemic period (15.4% vs. 19.2%). During the pandemic, among those with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, those with acute SARS-CoV-2 infection had lower likelihood of survival compared with those without acute infection (6.2% vs. 16%). SARS-CoV-2 infection itself accounted for 18.5% of the pandemic survival decline, whereas Utstein Formula for Survival elements mediated 68.2% of the survival decline, according to researchers. The Utstein Formula for Survival is widely recognized as a way of predicting survival from sudden cardiac arrest, employing three elements in hypothesizing potential survival rates: medical science, educational efficiency and local implementation.

“Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survival was poorer during the pandemic years, largely owing to changes in systemwide Utstein characteristics, as opposed to patient-specific acute SARS-CoV-2 infection,” the researchers wrote. “Overall, the findings underscore the adverse public health consequences from indirect, sometimes unanticipated, effects of the pandemic.”