Fact checked byRichard Smith

Read more

October 12, 2022
2 min read
Save

Hearts from SARS-CoV-2-positive donors safe for transplant

Fact checked byRichard Smith

Adults who received heart transplants from SARS-CoV-2-positive donors experienced similar 30-day and 1-year outcomes compared with recipients of SARS-CoV-2-negative hearts, according to a registry analysis.

Heart transplant rates and additions to the waitlist decreased during the pandemic, in part because of concerns surrounding use of allografts from SARS-CoV-2-positive donors, Clancy W. Mullan, MD, a resident at Yale New Haven Hospital, and colleagues wrote in a research letter in JACC: Heart Failure. Additionally, the extent of cardiac injury after mild SARS-CoV-2 infection is an active area of investigation.

Clancy W. Mullan

“Although clinical evidence of cardiac injury is rare in otherwise healthy, young, infected persons, endothelial dysfunction and subcellular derangements could theoretically have longer-term consequences for a mild or subclinical infection in the transplanted organ,” Mullan and colleagues wrote.

Mullan and colleagues analyzed data from patients who underwent a heart transplant from March 2020 to December 2021. Researchers identified recipients of organs from SARS-CoV-2-positive donors and compared them with recipients of SARS-CoV-2-negative donors. The primary outcome of interest was patient posttransplantation mortality.

Researchers identified 32 recipients of organs from SARS-CoV-2-positive donors and compared them with 5,445 recipients of allografts from SARS-CoV-2-negative donors during the same period. Survival at 30 days and 1 year was 100% for the recipients of organs from SARS-CoV-2-positive donors and there were no apparent differences in short-term survival compared with recipients of organs from SARS-CoV-2-negative donors (P = .342 at 30 days; P = .218 at 1 year).

Compared with declined donors, the accepted organs came from donors who were younger (median age, 28 vs. 47 years; P < .001), less likely to be women (8.1% vs. 39.1%; P = .002) and of lower BMI (median, 27 kg/m2 vs. 31.6 kg/m2; P = .001). Accepted hearts had higher ejection fraction (median, 64% vs. 60%; P = .04) and were less likely to be donated after circulatory death (8.1% vs. 56.4%; P < .001), according to the researchers.

The researchers noted there was no data on COVID-19 symptomatology of the donors or its temporal relation to organ retrieval; however, data were “encouraging” that short-term survival was similar for recipients of organs from SARS-CoV-2-positive and SARS-CoV-2-negative donors.

“The question of whether to accept hearts from SARS-CoV-2-positive donors is an important ethical dilemma that needs to be addressed promptly,” the researchers wrote. “As patients languish on organ waitlists without viable alternatives and thousands of new SARS-CoV-2 diagnoses are made daily in the United States alone, transplant clinicians and centers have a duty to discuss the potential risks and benefits of transplantation clearly and openly from a SARS-CoV-2 test positive donor vs. the risk of continued waiting.”