Fact checked byRichard Smith

Read more

August 19, 2024
2 min read
Save

Single cell-free DNA test accurately detects fetal antigen status in alloimmunized women

Fact checked byRichard Smith
You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Key takeaways:

  • Cell-free fetal antigen analyses had 100% consistency for 465 calls on antigens in which women were alloimmunized or genotype negative.
  • Cell-free DNA analyses had a sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of 100%.
Perspective from Sarah Horvath, MD, MSHP

Cell-free DNA analyses were accurate in detecting fetal antigen status as early as 10 weeks’ gestation in women with alloimmunized pregnancies, according to results of a large, diverse U.S. cohort study published in Obstetrics & Gynecology.

In European countries, cell-free DNA has already been used as a standard of care to determine fetal antigen status and guide pregnancy management.

Among 156 alloimmunized pregnant women, researchers observed
Data was derived from Rego S, et al. Obstet Gynecol. 2024;doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000005692.

“We recognize that less than 1% of pregnancies are alloimmunized, but those of you taking care of these patients also recognize that there is a significant opportunity to improve care for those families, and we can drastically simplify management for over 50% of alloimmunized patients simply by knowing the fetal status,” Jen Hoskovec, MS, CGC, vice president of medical affairs at BillionToOne, a molecular diagnostics company, said during a related webinar. “In this particular paper, as well as in previous studies and our clinical experience, over 50% of samples that come in for fetal antigen status are released as not detected or fetus is negative, indicating that those pregnancies do not need the extensive follow up and management that they would have had otherwise. And we wanted to ensure that this test was accessible to all patients, which is why it was designed and currently is offered as an addon to a routine screen, allowing us to do it quickly with a rapid turnaround time of about 4 to 6 days, at no additional cost or resource to the to the family.”

Researchers conducted a prospective, multicenter cohort study with data from 156 alloimmunized pregnant women from 10 to 37 weeks’ gestation who received clinically ordered BillionToOne’s UNITY Fetal Antigen cell-free DNA testing from 120 U.S. practices in 37 states. Median gestational age at the time of fetal antigen testing was 16.4 weeks with a median fetal fraction of 11.1%. After delivery, all women submitted neonatal buccal swabs for antigen genotyping when their infants were aged 0 to 270 days.

Overall, 15.4% of women were Hispanic, 9% were Black, 65.4% were white, 4.5% were Asian, 1.3% were multiple races/ethnicities and 4.5% were of unknown race/ethnicity. The cohort was alloimmunized to 191 antigens. The most common alloimmunized antigen was E in 53 women and 34 women were alloimmunized to multiple antigens.

Researchers observed 100% consistency between cell-free DNA analyses and neonatal genotype for 465 antigen calls. This included 190 antigen calls wherein the mother was alloimmunized and 275 wherein the mother was not alloimmunized but was genotype negative and able to become alloimmunized. The antigen calls were for K1 (n = 143), E (n = 124), C (n = 60), Fya (n = 50), c (n = 47 )and RhD (n = 41 ) antigens. Of these, 145 calls had antigen-positive fetuses.

Prenatal fetal antigen cell-free DNA analyses had a sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of 100%.

“This particular paper really was focused on the alloimmunized patients, but then continued on, just to show that for patients who are negative for particular red blood cell antigens, we can accurately call the fetal status,” Hoskovec said. “This is important, obviously for alloimmunized patients, but it's also quite important currently in the conversation of patients who are RH negative given that we know that across the country there are many centers that are dealing with a shortage of RhoGAM.”

References: