Fact checked byKristen Dowd

Read more

August 27, 2024
4 min read
Save

Risk for respiratory-related ED visits high on days with thunderstorms, power outages

Fact checked byKristen Dowd
You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Key takeaways:

  • Thunderstorms and power outages together negatively impact the risk for respiratory-related ED visits.
  • Researchers evaluated this relationship across six respiratory disease subtypes.

The risk for respiratory-related ED visits in New York was greater on days with both thunderstorms and power outages vs. days with only one of these events, according to results published in Environmental Health Perspectives.

“Unlike most prior studies focusing on asthma only, we considered all respiratory diseases and their subtypes, providing a comprehensive picture regarding the respiratory impacts of thunderstorms and [power outages],” Shao Lin, MD, MPH, PhD, professor in the school of public health at University at Albany, and colleagues wrote.

Infographic showing groups within subgroups that had the highest risk for respiratory-related ED visits on days with both thunderstorms and power outages.
Data were derived from Lin S, et al. Environ Health Perspect. 2024;doi:10.1289/EHP13237.

In this study, Lin and colleagues analyzed 10,674,742 ED visits (30.26% aged 18 to 44 years; 54.19% female; 41.97% white) in New York State during 2005 through 2018 for respiratory diseases to determine how thunderstorms, power outages and a combination of both impact the risk for respiratory-related ED visits via distributed lag nonlinear models.

Researchers also assessed which patients faced greater risks based on demographics and how PM2.5 and relative humidity mediated relationships found.

As Healio previously reported, a large-scale study found that ED visits for thunderstorm-related acute respiratory illnesses were increased in older U.S. adults, including those with asthma and COPD.

The most common respiratory disease subtype within the total cohort was respiratory allergy diseases (39%). The remaining five subtypes had a smaller proportion of ED cases: asthma (22%), respiratory infections (11%), bronchitis (10%), COPD (5%) and “other” (13%).

On days with thunderstorms vs. days with no thunderstorms, researchers observed a significant risk for all respiratory-related ED visits on lag 0 (adjusted risk ratio [aRR] = 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.03) in a model controlling for ozone, temperature, day of the week, holidays, time and year.

Similarly, the risk for all respiratory-related ED visits on lag 0 was significant on days with power outages vs. days with no power outages (aRR = 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.02).

Once combined, researchers found a greater risk on lag 0 (aRR = 1.09; 95% CI, 1.04-1.15) and lag 1 (aRR = 1.05; 95% CI, 1.01-1.09) than those observed in the individual analyses of thunderstorms and power outages.

In the model evaluating thunderstorms and power outages together, the risk ratio ranged from 0.97 to 0.99 on lag 2, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10, whereas on lag 3, 4 and 5, the risk ratio ranged from 0.95 to 0.96.

Looking at multiday lags in the combined cohort, the risk for all respiratory-related ED visits was heightened on lag 0 to 0 (aRR = 1.09; 95% CI, 1.04-1.15) and lag 0 to 1 (aRR = 1.07; 95% CI, 0.97-1.17). Risk ratios below one were observed in the remaining multiday lags.

Compared with the nonpollen season, the risk for all respiratory-related ED visits on days with both thunderstorms and power outages was greater during grass pollen season (highest RR = 1.28; 95% CI, 1.16-1.4), ragweed season (highest RR = 1.2; 95% CI, 1.12-1.29) and tree pollen season (highest RR = 1.12; 95% CI, 1.04-1.21).

Among the six respiratory disease subtypes, researchers noted higher risks for asthma, COPD, respiratory infections and “other” respiratory diseases on days with only thunderstorms vs. days with only power outages.

On days with thunderstorms vs. days with no thunderstorms, the disease subtype linked to the greatest risk was COPD (RR = 1.12; 95% CI, 1.08-1.17). Similarly, the risk for COPD was the highest of all subtypes on days with power outages vs. days with no power outages (RR = 1.11; 95% CI, 1.09-1.13).

In contrast to the risk ratio range of 1.01 to 1.12 for all but one disease subtype in the models considering thunderstorms alone and power outages alone, the risk ratio range for all subtypes was 1.07 to 1.44 on days with both thunderstorms and power outages.

Based on various demographics and seasons, the risk for respiratory-related ED visits on days with both thunderstorms and power outages differed in multiple instances. The cohort(s) with higher risk in each subgroup included:

  • nonresidents vs. residents of New York City (RR = 1.1; 95% CI, 1.05-1.16 vs. 0.76; 95% CI, 0.5-1.15);
  • individuals aged 6 to 17 years (RR = 1.37; 95% CI, 1.16-1.62) and 65 years or older (RR = 1.36; 95% CI, 1.2-1.53);
  • Hispanic vs. non-Hispanic individuals (RR = 1.25; 95% CI, 1.04-1.5);
  • individuals with self-paid insurance (RR = 1.59; 95% CI, 1.29-1.97) and Medicare recipients (RR = 1.35; 95% CI, 1.21-1.5);
  • noncore/rural area residents (RR = 1.65; 95% CI, 1.32-2.08); and
  • spring (RR = 1.17; 95% CI, 1.06-1.3) and summer seasons (RR = 1.2; 95% CI, 1.12-1.29).

Researchers also found a significant difference in the average number of comorbidities for all respiratory ED cases after vs. before a day with both thunderstorms and power outages (2.874 vs. 2.223).

In terms of modification, five factors significantly modified the impact thunderstorms have on respiratory-related ED visits: extreme cold, extreme heat, high relative humidity, PM2.5 and ozone concentrations.

Lastly, PM2.5 mediated the association between thunderstorms and respiratory-related ED visits by 36%. Similarly, relative humidity mediated the association by 38%.

“Our findings require validation by future studies with complete case ascertainment, and complete data on confounding factors such as pollen and indoor environment,” Lin and colleagues wrote.