Fact checked byKristen Dowd

Read more

April 24, 2024
3 min read
Save

Online inhaler technique resources often overlook critical steps

Fact checked byKristen Dowd
You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Key takeaways:

  • Online resources tended to feature more steps on inhalation technique rather than preparation/first use and post-usage/device care.
  • Website quality was moderate based on two metrics and low based on one metric.
Perspective from Tori Martel, MPH

Websites focused on inhaler technique frequently overlook important preparation steps and device care/maintenance, according to results published in Respiratory Medicine.

These findings emphasize the importance of supplementing online resources with comprehensive education from health care professionals, according to researchers.

Quote from Brandon Luu

“Although online resources can be a helpful tool to supplement inhaler technique, these resources may miss important information,” Brandon Luu, MD, resident physician in internal medicine at the University of Toronto, told Healio. “Physicians and patients should be aware of this, as online resources should not replace in-person education.”

In this study, Luu, along with Dmitry Rozenberg, MD, PhD, FRCPC, respirologist at the University Health Network and assistant professor in the department of medicine at the University of Toronto, and colleagues evaluated the top five Google search results for 12 common inhaler devices in April 2023.

They analyzed website quality using several metrics such as the Global Quality Scale, DISCERN and JAMA Benchmark scores.

Additionally, they compared website content against product monographs for preparation to gauge the comprehensiveness of the information provided.

Most websites were from foundation/advocacy organizations (55%) or were classified as a scientific resource (38%) rather than an industry/for-profit resource (7%).

The geographic origins of the websites included North America (78%), Australia (15%) and Europe (7%).

Website content, quality

Using a predefined score from product monographs, in which a higher score signals more steps addressed, researchers observed a median content total score of 62%.

The 60 websites tended to feature more steps on inhalation technique (median score, 78%) rather than preparation/first use (median score, 58%) or post-usage/device care (median score, 50%).

According to Luu, there was less focus on how to prepare, maintain and store inhalers.

“We were surprised to find that information on many websites was not in line with many product monographs with several important instructions not discussed,” Luu told Healio. “This could have implications for respiratory disease control for people relying on this information.”

Based on website category type, industry resources had higher total content scores, inhalation technique scores and preparation/first use scores than foundation/advocacy organization websites and scientific resources (P < .05).

In terms of quality, researchers reported moderate website quality based on the Global Quality Scale and modified DISCERN scores (median score, 3) and low quality based on the JAMA Benchmark score (median score, 1).

Few websites had authorship (20%) or attribution (30%), which led to the low JAMA Benchmark score, the researchers wrote.

Inclusion of clinically relevant factors

In addition to content and quality, researchers looked for mentions of 10 clinically relevant factors on the 60 websites and found a median score of two factors per website.

Only 38% of websites directed patients on when they should go to their provider for urgent medical attention or highlighted frequent errors for a particular inhaler type.

Luu told Healio that a small percentage of websites featured information on side effects (25%), contraindications (10%) and the importance of inhaler technique supervision by a health care professional (28%).

Additionally, none of the included websites mentioned smoking cessation, environmental considerations or risk factors for poor technique, according to researchers.

Of the three website categories, the greatest median score for clinically relevant factors was found on industry resources (6.5), followed by scientific resources (2) and foundation/advocacy organization websites (1).

“We want to emphasize that the internet can be a helpful way to remind patients about inhaler technique, but if patients have any concerns/questions, they should connect with a health care professional and have their inhaler technique routinely supervised,” Luu said.

In terms of future research, the research team has plans to conduct a survey study to explore how patients and health care providers utilize and perceive online inhaler resources.

“We are excited to have characterized the current state of online inhaler resources; however, what remains unknown is how health care providers and patients currently use and perceive these online resources,” Luu said. “As such, we have received funding for a survey study from the Physicians' Services Incorporated Foundation to explore the use and perceptions of online inhaler resources by patients and health care providers.”