Patient-reported outcome survey may provide accurate measures with low completion burden
Click Here to Manage Email Alerts
Published results showed a patient-reported outcome measurement survey for physical function may have a small burden to patients in terms of time commitment while providing accurate measures of postoperative functional improvements.
“Our study noted that [time to complete] the [patient-reported outcome measurement information system-physical function] PROMIS-PF did not significantly influence postoperative outcomes following [minimally invasive lumbar decompression], suggesting a low burden to patients of administering this questionnaire,” Kern Singh, MD, told Healio. “By incorporating the PROMIS-PF questionnaire into their spinal practice, surgeons may gain better insight on patients function with minimal burden of survey completion at preoperative and postoperative follow-up timepoints.”
Singh and colleagues evaluated PROMIS-PF scores, as well as VAS scores for back and leg pain, preoperatively and at 6 and 12 weeks, 1 month, and 1 year postoperatively among 91 patients who underwent minimally invasive single-level lumbar decompression from 2015 to 2020. Researchers evaluated a minimum clinically important difference (MCID) for PROMIS-PF and VAS back and leg scores, and calculated time to complete as the difference in start and stop time for completed questionnaires.
Results showed patients had significant improvements in PROMIS-PF scores, as well as VAS back and leg scores, at all postoperative time points, with most patients achieving a MCID. Researchers noted no significant difference in time to complete at any time point. Although researchers found no significant correlation between PROMIS-PF scores and time to complete at any time point, they noted a correlation between PROMIS-PF scores and VAS back and leg scores.