Read more

October 04, 2021
1 min read
Save

Increased risk factors may reduce cost-effectiveness of adult spinal deformity surgery

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Results showed a higher number of risk factors prior to and during adult spinal deformity surgery may reduce cost-effectiveness by increasing total cost and reducing quality-adjusted life years.

Peter G. Passias, MD, and colleagues collected demographic variables and surgical and complication data, and assessed health-related quality of life using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and SF-36 among 727 patients enrolled in the International Spine Study Group Adult Spinal Deformity database.

“In terms of risk stratification criteria, we modified the original work that was done by [Ferran Pellisé, MD, PhD and colleagues] to more appropriately fit our population,” Passias said in his presentation at the North American Spine Society Annual Meeting, which received a 2021 Value Award.

Peter G. Passias
Peter G. Passias

He noted these criteria included lowest instrumental vertebrae at pelvis, frailty, sagittal deformity, lordosis gap, T1 sagittal tilt, blood loss and surgical time.

“Patients in the highest tertials of these frailty, sagittal deformity measures, estimated blood loss and surgical times were defined as possessing the risk factor of interest for the purpose of our analysis,” Passias said.

Researchers made cost calculations using the PearlDiver database and used standardized estimate by regression analysis of Medicare pay-scales to ensure generalizability. They included all services within a 30-day window in cost calculations and assessed complications and comorbidities according to CMS definitions.

Passias noted patients had corresponding increases in major complication rates and reoperation rates as the number of risk factors increased.

“Patients who met three of the four risk factors had significantly higher major complication rates, reoperations, surgical ICU admissions, proximal kyphosis, pseudoarthrosis by 2 years, surgical implant failure and rod and screw breakage,” Passias said.

Cost evaluation showed an increase per risk factor when analyzing risk factor quantity against initial surgical cost, according to Passias. Trend-line analysis for risk factors against national average cost showed a more robust difference. Passias noted risk factors had a positive correlation with 2-year ODI and cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) increased by approximately $46,000 per risk factor.

“Generally, across the board, as risk factors increased, total 2-year cost increased, QALYs gained at 2 years and life expectancy decreased, and cost per QALY at life expectancy increased, indicating decreased cost-effectiveness,” Passias said.