Lumbar total disc replacement delayed progression of radiographic adjacent-level degeneration
At 5-year follow-up, investigators found the rates of radiographic adjacent-level degeneration and clinical adjacent-level degeneration after lumbar total disc replacement were low and were similar to those reported in previous total disc replacement studies.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b350a/b350a35cffbbc430a20b8fdbc16e953c3a4081e0" alt=""
“Our study reinforced the scientific evidence showing that motion is protective of the adjacent level in the lumbar spine,” Jack E. Zigler, MD, told Healio.com/Orthopedics. “Our results were consistent in showing that radiographic adjacent-segment degeneration 5 years following arthroplasty is a fraction of that observed following fusion in randomized, matched cohorts of patients. [The] activL, with its improved maintenance of range of motion, leads to even more protection of the adjacent segment with even less radiographic deterioration after 5 years than older-designed implants.”
Zigler and colleagues performed a post-hoc analysis of 175 patients with single-level, symptomatic disc degeneration who underwent total disc replacement (TDR) and either received an activL implant (Aesculap Implant Systems) or a ProDisc-L implant (DePuy Synthes). Patients had preoperative and 5-year postoperative radiographs which were evaluated with the Kellgren-Lawrence scale. Disc height, endplate sclerosis, osteophytes and spondylolisthesis were assessed to evaluate degeneration at adjacent levels. Adjacent-level degeneration (ALD) outcomes were compared between TDR and fusion.
Results showed 90.3% of patients who underwent TDR who showed no evidence of ALD progression at the superior adjacent level at the 5-year follow-up. However, 9.7% had ALD progression. Investigators found 2.3% of patients showed clinical ADL at 5 years, but none of these patients had the condition at baseline. After matching and taking baseline characteristics into consideration, investigators found TDR had a significantly lower risk of ALD progression compared with fusion.
“For each degree of range of motion gained at the TDR level, there was a consistent decrease in the percentage of patients with ALD,” the researchers wrote. – by Monica Jaramillo
Disclosure : The study was supported by funds from Aesculap Implant Systems LLC.