Issue: May 2016
April 11, 2016
1 min read
Save

Findings link acromion spurs with full-thickness cuff tears

Issue: May 2016
You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Full-thickness cuff tears were associated with the presence of an acromion spur, and a higher acromial index and critical shoulder angle. However, a higher acromial index and critical shoulder angle were not associated with partial tears, according to results.

Based on sonographic examination, researchers categorized 166 patients who presented with non-traumatic unilateral shoulder pain into a degenerative full-thickness tear cohort (group 1), partial thickness bursal tear cohort (group 2) or normal cuff cohort (group 3).

Vivek Pandey

 

Results showed a strong association between the presence of an acromial spur and a full-thickness cuff tear. Researchers found a statistically significant difference between the means of group 1 and group 3, as revealed by the acromial index and critical shoulder angle. However, researchers found no statistically significant differences between group 1 and group 2 in means of acromial index, as well as between group 2 and group 3 in means of acromial index and critical shoulder angle.

According to results of the receiver operating characteristic curve, critical shoulder angle had a higher area vs. acromial index. Researchers found critical shoulder angle and a spur were confirmed to be stronger predictors of a full-thickness cuff tear by stepwise logistic regression, while acromial index was rejected as a cuff tear predictor. Overall, the Bigliani acromial type had no association with rotator cuff tear, according to results. – by Casey Tingle

 

Disclosure: The researchers report no relevant financial disclosures.